Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Daily Report : Big Tech has been holding up but more stocks falling to new lows

Jason Goepfert
2023-09-19
Even as the Nasdaq 100 index has jumped higher over the past month, more and more stocks in the index have been falling to 52-week lows. This is one of the largest divergences in 40 years, but similar behavior hasn't been a consistent worry. It would be more troublesome if we see more signs of a split market.
View/Print a PDF version of this Report

Headlines


Big Tech has been holding up but more stocks falling to new lows: Even as the Nasdaq 100 index has jumped higher over the past month, more and more stocks in the index have been falling to 52-week lows. This is one of the largest divergences in 40 years, but similar behavior hasn't been a consistent worry. It would be more troublesome if we see more signs of a split market.

Smart / Dumb Money Confidence

Smart Money Confidence: 28% Dumb Money Confidence: 55%

Risk Levels

Stocks Short-Term

Stocks Medium-Term

Bonds

Crude Oil

Gold

Agriculture

Research

Big Tech has been holding up but more stocks falling to new lows

By Jason Goepfert

BOTTOM LINE
Even as the Nasdaq 100 index has jumped higher over the past month, more and more stocks in the index have been falling to 52-week lows. This is one of the largest divergences in 40 years, but similar behavior hasn't been a consistent worry. It would be more troublesome if we see more signs of a split market.

FORECAST / TIMEFRAME
None

Key points:

  • The tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 has jumped over the past month, but more stocks are falling to 52-week lows
  • This has been one of the larger divergences in 40 years but hasn't been especially troubling
  • It will be more worrisome if technical sell signals start piling up, suggesting a heavily split market

While the Nasdaq 100 has jumped, more stocks are falling to new lows

There are some nascent signs that the good participation among stocks that have helped to sustain the market since October is slipping. Some of the biggest drivers of the rally have been massive tech stocks, which are heavily represented in the Nasdaq 100.

That index has rebounded spectacularly, and it hasn't just been a handful of stocks, though they're the ones getting the attention and accounting for many of the index points. But like we're seeing within the S&P 500, there are some initial signs that all is not well within the index.

Over the past 20 days, the Nasdaq 100 has rallied several percent. But the percentage of stocks within the index that have fallen to a 52-week low has more than doubled.

Divergences like this can be an effective heads-up of looming trouble in the index. So far, the signs of internal deterioration are isolated, and historical similarities aren't all that troubling...yet.

A new low split in the NDX hasn't been all that problematic

The table below shows every time over the past (nearly) 40 years when the NDX climbed by more than 3.5% over the past month, yet the 20-day average of 52-week lows climbed by more than 1.5%. It filters out any signals that occurred when the index was more than 10% from a multi-year high.

It's kind of a weird way of expressing things, but it shows times like now when the index jumped by a substantial amount, but there was also a sustained rise in the number of its stocks plunging to new lows.

It wasn't much of a problem. Over the past 30 years, the Nasdaq 100 continued to rise over the medium- to long-term every time. It was not an effective indicator of imminent demise.

The conundrum of rising new lows within the index has been going on for more than just the past 20 sessions; it's been over 30 sessions. The table below takes a slightly different look. This shows times when the index was basically flat over the past 30 days, but new lows rose substantially.

This one captured a significant decline before the 1990 recession and just before the global financial crisis, but all the others preceded gains.

So, the initial evidence isn't compelling enough to suggest the index is in immediate trouble. It would be more worrisome if further signs of internal deterioration started to trigger. It happened in June, with a bevy of technical warnings via the Titanic Syndrome on the broader Nasdaq exchange.

The Backtest Engine shows that the Nasdaq 100 suffered poor consistency and average returns from 6-12 months after a cluster of these signals over 20 days. It would be even more worrisome if these signals started cropping up again, especially if it's coupled with triggers in the Hindenburg Omen, further indicating signs of a terribly split market.

What the research tells us...

For one of the few times in almost a year, we're starting to see signs of a split in the market. Whereas during most of the last 11 months, most stocks were rising, and there were multiple bouts of buying thrusts, buyers' interests have become more concentrated and isolated. That doesn't necessarily spell imminent doom, but it's not a great sign.

Some of the indexes that have shown the best gains, like the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100, are seeing the first signs of becoming split between big winners and big losers, but so far, it hasn't been enough to be all that worrisome. If more divergences begin piling up, especially if it's reflected in technical sell signals, we'd have more compelling evidence to take it more seriously.


Indicators at Extremes

Click here to view on the site (% Extremes and "Excess" tabs on the dashboard).
% Showing Pessimism: 7%
Bullish for Stocks

Inverse ETF Volume
Rydex Sector Breadth
Equity Put/Call Ratio De-Trended
OEX Put/Call Ratio
% Showing Optimism: 32%
Bearish for Stocks

Smart Money / Dumb Money Confidence Spread
Smart Money Confidence
% Showing Excess Optimism
VIX
Rydex Money Market %
Rydex Ratio
Rydex Bearish Flow
Retail Money Market Ratio
SKEW Index
OEX Open Interest Ratio
Risk Appetite Index
AIM (Advisor and Investor Model)
Major Index Combo
NYSE Available Cash
Equity / Money Market Asset Ratio
AAII Allocation - Stocks
Mutual Fund Cash Level
VIX Transform

Phase Table

Click here to view the Phase Table on the site.

Ranks

Click here to view on the site (Ranks tab on the Dashboard).

Sentiment Around The World

Click here to view on the site.

Optimism Index Thumbnails

Sector ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Country ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Bond ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Currency ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average
Commodity ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average
PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.