Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Daily Report : A Monthly Stock Market Anomaly That Hides in Sight; The Closest 200-Day Comparisons

Jason Goepfert
2021-09-15
One of the keys to long-term success is to find an "edge" in the markets and exploit it repeatedly. What we find when we look carefully is that often some of the most consistent market edges "hide in plain sight." This piece highlights a monthly phenomenon in the stock market that fits the bill.; The past 200 days in the S&P 500 have been among the index's most consistent ever. But there have been 18 other stretches that show a very high positive correlation, so we look at these analogs and see some short-term weakness among many of them.
View/Print a PDF version of this Report

Headlines


A Monthly Stock Market Anomaly That Hides in Sight: One of the keys to long-term success is to find an "edge" in the markets and exploit it repeatedly. What we find when we look carefully is that often some of the most consistent market edges "hide in plain sight." This piece highlights a monthly phenomenon in the stock market that fits the bill.

The Closest 200-Day Comparisons: The past 200 days in the S&P 500 have been among the index's most consistent ever. But there have been 18 other stretches that show a very high positive correlation, so we look at these analogs and see some short-term weakness among many of them.

Bottom Line:

STOCKS: Hold
Sentiment continues to decline from the speculative February peak. With deteriorating breadth, this raises the risk of poor short- to medium-term returns until optimism and better breadth returns. See the Outlook & Allocations page for more.

BONDS: Hold
Various parts of the market got hit in March, with the lowest Bond Optimism Index we usually see during healthy environments. Bond prices have modest recovered and there is no edge among the data we follow.

GOLD: Hold
Gold and miners were rejected after trying to recover above their 200-day averages in May. Lately, some medium-term (not long-term) oversold extremes in breadth measures among miners have triggered.

Smart / Dumb Money Confidence

Smart Money Confidence: 47% Dumb Money Confidence: 54%

Risk Levels

Stocks Short-Term

Stocks Medium-Term

Bonds

Crude Oil

Gold

Agriculture

Research

A Monthly Stock Market Anomaly That Hides in Sight

By Jay Kaeppel

BOTTOM LINE
One of the keys to long-term success is to find an "edge" in the markets and exploit it repeatedly. What we find when we look carefully is that often some of the most consistent market edges "hide in plain sight." This piece highlights a monthly phenomenon in the stock market that fits the bill.

FORECAST / TIMEFRAME
None

Let's look at a time of the month that has demonstrated a strong tendency to witness weakness in the stock market.  

IDENTIFYING "TRADING DAY OF MONTH"

For this piece, we start by counting back trading days from the end of the calendar month. As such:

  • The last trading day of the month is designated as "TDM -1"
  • The 2nd to last trading day of the month is designated as "TDM -2"
  • And so on back to TDM -10

So for example, for September 2021:

  • TDM -11 = 9/16
  • TDM -10 = 9/17
  • TDM -9 = 9/20
  • TDM -8 = 9/21
  • TDM -7 = 9/22
  • TDM -6 = 9/23
  • TDM -5 = 9/24

THE PERIOD UNDER CONSIDERATION

The period will look at is:

  • The 6-day period each month that includes TDM -10 through TDM -5
  • So for September 2021, we would measure from the close on 9/16 through the close on 9/24
  • We will look at 90 years of history from 12/31/1930 through 12/31/2020

1931-2020: 90 YEARS OF RESULTS

The figure below shows the cumulative % price gain for the S&P 500 Index held only during this 6-trading day period each month over the full 90-year test period (i.e., the cumulative price return if one had bought the S&P 500 Index at the close of TDM -11 and sold it six trading days later at the close on the 5th to last trading day of the month, and repeated this process every single month).

Clearly, it is NOT a pretty picture.

For the record, had an investor been stubborn (foolish?) enough to buy-and-hold the S&P 500 Index ONLY during this 6-day period every month starting in January 1931, the cumulative loss through 12/31/2020 would be -94.9%. This was during a 90-year period, which saw the S&P 500 Index grow +24,386% (using price data only) on a buy-and-hold basis.

The table below displays the cumulative hypothetical price-performance achieved by holding the S&P 500 Index:

  • ONLY during trading days TDM -10 through TDM -5 each month
  • During all trading days, NOT including TDM -10 through TDM -5
  • On a Buy-and-Hold Basis

The table below displays the decade-by-decade price performance for holding the S&P 500 Index:

Considering Time of Year

As long as we are venturing out "into the weeds," let's go one step further and point out that there appears to be a, um, seasonal element to this seasonal element. In a nutshell, TDM -10 to -5 performance has been significantly weaker during June through November than during December through May.

The chart below displays the cumulative % return achieved by holding the S&P 500 Index ONLY during TDM -10 through TDM -5 every month, depending on the particular months involved.

Results during December through May are poor but are essentially "hit or miss."  Results during June through November have been mostly "miss."


The Closest 200-Day Comparisons

By Jason Goepfert

BOTTOM LINE
The past 200 days in the S&P 500 have been among the index's most consistent ever. But there have been 18 other stretches that show a very high positive correlation, so we look at these analogs and see some short-term weakness among many of them.

FORECAST / TIMEFRAME
None

It's easy to look at a chart and cherry-pick dates to say, "Hey this looks just like that!" and make a conclusion. One of the common ones lately has been comparing the last 200 days to the initial thrust off past bear market bottoms.

Fair enough, but the past 200 sessions have been remarkable for their calm. Most other kick-offs have suffered at least some volatility along the way.

If we use the objective calculations we always do for analogs, then we can look at other 200-day periods in the S&P 500's history to see which ones have the highest correlation to the recent past. It turns out there were 18 other stretches with a very high correlation, when the S&P was also trading at a multi-year high at the time.

The chart below shows the last 200 days in the index (blue) along with an average of the 18 stretches with the highest correlation (black).

The chart shows that the average analog suffered a pullback right about now. When we look at thumbnails of the 10 most recent occurrences, we see how consistent that was.

A TENDENCY FOR SHORT-TERM DIPS

What we should be most interested in is future returns. If we look at the ends of the 200-day periods shown above, then we can see how the S&P fared going forward.

Shorter-term returns were not great, reflecting those pullbacks that we saw in the thumbnails. Across most time frames, the S&P's returns were below random, and the overall risk/reward was very poor.

One difference with our current market is just how strong the momentum and (mostly) breadth have been. The S&P just ended a historic streak with more than 75% of its members above their long-term trends, which showed that any shorter-term dips had a strong tendency to rebound in the months ahead. The current trend has been so calm, for so long, that an interruption would be par for the course but it would be rare for it to turn into a rout just yet.


Active Studies

Click here to view the Active Research on the site.
Time FrameBullishBearish
Short-Term06
Medium-Term53
Long-Term115

Indicators at Extremes

Click here to view on the site (% Extremes and "Excess" tabs on the dashboard).
% Showing Pessimism: 2%
Bullish for Stocks

Inverse ETF Volume
% Showing Optimism: 37%
Bearish for Stocks

S&P 500 Price Oscillator
S&P 500 Down Pressure
Short-term Optimism Index (Optix)
VIX Term Structure
% Showing Excess Pessimism
% Showing Excess Optimism
Rydex Money Market %
Rydex Ratio
SKEW Index
CSFB Fear Barometer
OEX Put/Call Ratio
OEX Open Interest Ratio
LOBO Put/Call Ratio
Options Speculation Index
Insider Buy/Sell Seasonally Adj
Equity Hedging Index
ROBO Put/Call Ratio
NAAIM Exposure Index
AAII Allocation - Stocks
Retail Money Market Ratio
NYSE Available Cash
Equity / Money Market Asset Ratio
Mutual Fund Cash Level
VIX Transform

Portfolio

PositionDescriptionWeight %Added / ReducedDate
StocksRSP4.1Added 4.1%2021-05-19
Bonds23.9% BND, 6.9% SCHP30.7Reduced 7.1%2021-05-19
CommoditiesGCC2.6Reduced 2.1%
2020-09-04
Precious MetalsGDX5.6Reduced 4.2%2021-05-19
Special Situations4.3% XLE, 2.2% PSCE7.6Reduced 5.6%2021-04-22
Cash49.4
Updates (Changes made today are underlined)

Much of our momentum and trend work has remained positive for several months, with some scattered exceptions. Almost all sentiment-related work has shown a poor risk/reward ratio for stocks, especially as speculation drove to record highs in exuberance in February. Much of that has worn off, and most of our models are back toward neutral levels. There isn't much to be excited about here.

The same goes for bonds and even gold. Gold has been performing well lately and is back above long-term trend lines. The issue is that it has a poor record of holding onto gains when attempting a long-term trend change like this, so we'll take a wait-and-see approach.

RETURN YTD:  8.7%

2020: 8.1%, 2019: 12.6%, 2018: 0.6%, 2017: 3.8%, 2016: 17.1%, 2015: 9.2%, 2014: 14.5%, 2013: 2.2%, 2012: 10.8%, 2011: 16.5%, 2010: 15.3%, 2009: 23.9%, 2008: 16.2%, 2007: 7.8%

Phase Table

Click here to view the Phase Table on the site.

Ranks

Click here to view on the site (Ranks tab on the Dashboard).

Sentiment Around The World

Click here to view on the site.

Optimism Index Thumbnails

Sector ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Country ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Bond ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Currency ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average
Commodity ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average
PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.