Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Daily Report : It's time to put commodities back on the radar - Part IV

Jason Goepfert
2023-07-03
In this final chapter, we highlight a strategy that switches between stocks and commodities based on the pattern detailed in the first three chapters.
View/Print a PDF version of this Report

Headlines


It's time to put commodities back on the radar - Part IV: In this final chapter, we highlight a strategy that switches between stocks and commodities based on the pattern detailed in the first three chapters.

Smart / Dumb Money Confidence

Smart Money Confidence: 26% Dumb Money Confidence: 82%

Risk Levels

Stocks Short-Term

Stocks Medium-Term

Bonds

Crude Oil

Gold

Agriculture

Research

It's time to put commodities back on the radar - Part IV

By Jay Kaeppel

BOTTOM LINE
In this final chapter, we highlight a strategy that switches between stocks and commodities based on the pattern detailed in the first three chapters.

FORECAST / TIMEFRAME
None

Key points

  • In Part I, we highlighted a 30-yr cycle that typically sees commodities significantly outperform stocks during the first 15 years and vice versa during the last 15 years
  • A new 30-yr cycle begins at the end of June 2023
  • Part II looked at commodity and stock performance during the first 15 years of previous cycles, and Part III looked at commodity and stock performance during the last 15 years of previous cycles
  • In Part IV, we consider a strategy that switches between commodities and stocks every 15 years

A quick review

As a quick refresher, to measure commodity returns, we use the following month-end prices for the following indexes:

  • For commodities, we use the Bloomberg futures index from 1933 to1960 and the Bloomberg Spot Commodity Index from 1960 to the present
  • For stocks, we use the monthly closing price for the S&P 500 Index

In Part I, we included the tables below. The first displays commodity and stock market performance during the first 15 years of each 30-year cycle since 1933. The second displays commodity and stock market performance during the last 15 years of each 30-year cycle since 1933 (this table is updated from the one in Part I to reflect performance through 2023-06-30).

A new 30-year cycle began at the close on 2023-06-30. The implication is that commodities will outperform stocks significantly over the next 15 years. There are, however, some real-world considerations to take into account upfront:

  • There is no guarantee that the pattern (commodities better during the first 15 years and stocks better during the last 15 years) will repeat over the next 30 years
  • Even if the pattern does hold, it should not be assumed that commodities will immediately begin to outperform stocks just because the calendar has passed 20230-06-30
  • Even if commodities do outperform stocks over the next 15 years, there will almost certainly be a great deal of volatility involved, and large drawdowns should be expected along the way
  • There is no inference being made that investors should dump and never hold stocks during the next 15 years, nor that anyone should concentrate 100% of their capital on commodities

With all of those caveats in mind - and for the sake of argument - let's consider a strategy that does, in fact, hold 100% commodities during the first 15 years of each 30-year cycle and 100% stocks during the second 15 years.

The baselines

The chart below displays separately the growth of $1 invested in commodities and $1 invested in stocks since June 1933. 

$1 in commodities grew to $100, and $1 in stocks grew to $408. From this, one might conclude that stocks "outperformed." And over the entire period, this is true. But a different picture emerges if we draw the same chart on a logarithmic scale.

In the logarithmic chart above, we see the back-and-forth nature of performance much more clearly. We can also note that stock and commodity performance was roughly even as late as early 2009. So most of the "vast outperformance" for stocks over the entire 90-year period occurred in the last 15 years.

As our primary baseline, we will buy-and-hold commodities and stocks on a 50/50 basis and rebalance to 50/50 at the end of each calendar year. This approach saw $1 grow to $371, as shown in the chart below.

The switching strategy

Our test begins on 1933-06-30. We will hold commodities for 15 years and then stocks for 15 years, and so on. The chart below displays the growth of $1 using this Switching Strategy (black line) versus the growth of $1 using the 50/50 strategy (blue line).

The chart below displays the same data as the chart above on a logarithmic scale.

From 1933 through June 2023, the hypothetical value of $1 invested using the Switching Strategy is $4,113. The hypothetical value of $1 invested using the 50/50 Strategy is $371. 

Comparing performance stats

The table below displays a variety of relevant facts and figures for:

  • The Switching Strategy
  • The 50/50 Strategy
  • Buying and holding commodities
  • Buying and holding stocks

All results are based on monthly data. Intra-month fluctuations may be more significant than what is reflected here.

One way to play

Most individual investors will never (and probably should never) trade commodity futures or attempt to trade in the cash markets. A straightforward alternative is to buy an ETF or ETN that tracks a basket of commodities. Many choices include the following tickers: PDBC, DBC, GSG, GCC, and others. Each has its unique set of holdings, and investors should do their research. Of those I tested, the Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (ticker PDBC) has a few advantages. It has a higher correlation to the Bloomberg Spot Commodity Index used in testing the past 90 years of performance than the others, it is heavily traded, it has a lower expense ratio than most of the others, and it does not issue a K-1 form at tax time as do most of the other more heavily traded commodity index related ETFs. It should be noted, however, that PDBC does not track a particular index but rather is actively managed. 

Per www.ETFDB.com:

The Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC), as the name implies, offers exposure to commodity futures without the tax hassle of a K-1, which some investors avoid. The fund is actively managed and tries to avoid "negative roll yield," a well-known problem of passive commodity funds that can substantially erode returns over time. There are several similar strategies on the market, including some that charge a lower fee, but PDBC has by far the most assets and trading volume.

What the research tells us…

Ninety years of history suggest that commodities should outperform stocks by a significant margin over the next 15 years. "Should" is the important word in the previous sentence. There is no guarantee that the pattern that has played out over the past 90 years will continue ad infinitum into the future. Just as importantly, on a relative basis, there can be no argument that stocks are presently outperforming commodities. So, just because a new first 15 years has begun does not mean the current trend will reverse anytime soon. It does mean that investors may be wise to open their minds to the prospect of investing in commodities as an asset class in the years ahead. 


Indicators at Extremes

Click here to view on the site (% Extremes and "Excess" tabs on the dashboard).
% Showing Pessimism: 3%
Bullish for Stocks

Inverse ETF Volume
Insider Buy/Sell Seasonally Adj
% Showing Optimism: 50%
Bearish for Stocks

Smart Money / Dumb Money Confidence Spread
Smart Money Confidence
S&P 500 Price Oscillator
NYSE High/Low Ratio
Short-term Optimism Index (Optix)
NYSE Arms Index
NYSE Up Volume Ratio
Dumb Money Confidence
VIX Term Structure
% Showing Excess Pessimism
% Showing Excess Optimism
Intermediate Term Optimism Index (Optix)
VIX
Rydex Money Market %
Rydex Ratio
Rydex Bearish Flow
SKEW Index
Options Speculation Index
Equity Put/Call Ratio De-Trended
OEX Put/Call Ratio
NAAIM Exposure Index
Risk Appetite Index
AAII Bull Ratio
AIM (Advisor and Investor Model)
Retail Money Market Ratio
NYSE Available Cash
Mutual Fund Cash Level
AAII Allocation - Stocks
Equity / Money Market Asset Ratio
VIX Transform

Phase Table

Click here to view the Phase Table on the site.

Ranks

Click here to view on the site (Ranks tab on the Dashboard).

Sentiment Around The World

Click here to view on the site.

Optimism Index Thumbnails

Sector ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Country ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Bond ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Currency ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average
Commodity ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average
PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.