Headlines
|
|
Record bets against stocks by small options traders:
The smallest of options traders increased their bearish bets against stocks last week. The premiums they paid for protection, compared to their speculative bets on a rally, exceeded even the March 2020 panic. As a percentage of stock market capitalization, their bearish bets just hit a 22-year record.
|
Smart / Dumb Money Confidence
|
Smart Money Confidence: 67%
Dumb Money Confidence: 22%
|
|
Risk Levels
Stocks Short-Term
|
Stocks Medium-Term
|
|
Bonds
|
Crude Oil
|
|
Gold
|
Agriculture
|
|
Research
By Jason Goepfert
BOTTOM LINE
The smallest of options traders increased their bearish bets against stocks last week. The premiums they paid for protection, compared to their speculative bets on a rally, exceeded even the March 2020 panic. As a percentage of stock market capitalization, their bearish bets just hit a 22-year record.
FORECAST / TIMEFRAME
None
|
Key points:
- Small options traders increased their bets against stocks last week
- The premiums they paid for bearish bets exceeded even the panic in March 2020
- As a percentage of stock market cap, their net bearish bets last week was a 22-year record
Record bearish bets by the most wrong-footed investors
Losses are mounting, and small traders are starting to panic.
Ostensibly the least sophisticated investors in the market, using leveraged and expiring instruments, the smallest of options traders tend to be a consistent contrary indicator. When their behavior reaches an extreme, it's rare to see stocks go their way.
A back-of-the-envelope analysis suggests that these traders could be sitting on $600 million or more of losses on their options trades since Thanksgiving. This is extremely rough, based on their net speculative options buys during the current week and the change in U.S. stock market capitalization over the following week.
Thanks to recent losses, small traders have resumed a high level of put buying, accounting for 30% of their total options volume last week.
A rise in put buying, combined with an increase in implied volatility, means that the traders spent more on those protective puts. Last week, they spent 27% more on put option premiums than call option premiums. That's even more skewed than at the peak of panic in March 2020.
Since 2000, there were only a few weeks when these traders spent 25% more on protective puts than speculative calls. The Backtest Engine shows that the S&P 500 had more to fall during the waterfall decline in July 2002, but all four weeks led to gains over the next year.
If we look at what is perhaps the most accurate reflection of retail sentiment, net speculative options activity as a percentage of U.S. stock market cap, we just fell to a record low.
It's rare for the smallest traders to bet against the stock market, and when they do, stocks have never failed to fail them. Last week's net relative bets against stocks exceed the previous records from November 21, 2008, and March 13-20, 2020.
What the research tells us...
It's hazardous to rely on a single factor to determine a complex system's risk versus reward potential. Even multiple factors can fail when they line up with the same conclusion. That's happened a handful of times just in the past decade. Currently, some indicators conflict with the behavior of small traders and argue for further selling before a true extreme is reached. This data is so compelling because of how consistent it has been over the decades that we've been following it. Sometimes it takes a while to play out, like last year. Still, the current level of outright bets against stocks suggests that further selling pressure in the week(s) ahead should show positively skewed risk/reward opportunities for medium- to long-term investors.
Indicators at Extremes
Phase Table
Ranks
Sentiment Around The World
Optimism Index Thumbnails
|
Sector ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
|
|
|
Country ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
|
|
|
Bond ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
|
|
|
Currency ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average
|
|
|
Commodity ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average
|
|
