Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Daily Report : Technical warnings pile up on the Nasdaq

Jason Goepfert
2024-05-29
While a handful of stocks have been getting most of the attention, there has been some deterioration under the surface on the Nasdaq exchange. More stocks have been seeing weakness, and signs of a split market are rising. The number of technical warning signs over the past year has spiked to an alarming degree.
View/Print a PDF version of this Report

Headlines


Technical warnings pile up on the Nasdaq: While a handful of stocks have been getting most of the attention, there has been some deterioration under the surface on the Nasdaq exchange. More stocks have been seeing weakness, and signs of a split market are rising. The number of technical warning signs over the past year has spiked to an alarming degree.

Smart / Dumb Money Confidence

Smart Money Confidence: 35% Dumb Money Confidence: 69%

Risk Levels

Stocks Short-Term

Stocks Medium-Term

Bonds

Crude Oil

Gold

Agriculture

Research

Technical warnings pile up on the Nasdaq

By Jason Goepfert

BOTTOM LINE
While a handful of stocks have been getting most of the attention, there has been some deterioration under the surface on the Nasdaq exchange. More stocks have been seeing weakness, and signs of a split market are rising. The number of technical warning signs over the past year has spiked to an alarming degree.

FORECAST / TIMEFRAME
None

Key points:

  • The number of technical warning signs on the Nasdaq exchange continues to increase
  • On that exchange, there have been a large number of days with a split market over the past year
  • The only other times there have been this many protracted warning signs were ahead of peaks in 1990, 2000, and 2007

Warnings continue to pile up

On Tuesday, we saw how more and more stocks are diverging from the Nasdaq 100 index. These performance divergences aren't just isolated to the large stocks in the NDX; they are endemic to the broader Nasdaq exchange.

We looked at some of the warnings on the Nasdaq in April. The trend has continued into this month and, in some cases, has gotten worse. The number of technical warnings keeps rising.

Over the past 100 days, the number of Hindenburg Omens has spiked to the highest level in four years. It monitors conditions analysts have interpreted throughout history as signifying potential market weaknesses.

We use three criteria:

  1. The Nasdaq 100 is above its 50-day moving average
  2. Both new 52-week lows and 52-week highs on the Nasdaq are greater than 2.8% of all advancing and declining issues
  3. The Nasdaq McClellan Oscillator is negative.

When the signal triggers, it highlights a "split" market, which is unhealthy. Multiple signals in a cluster is a worrying sign.


The same goes for the Titanic Syndrome, though it's not quite as severe. It highlights a technical market condition when stocks have recently been at a high, and then there is a sudden jump in new 52-week lows versus highs on the Nasdaq.

When we combine the two signals and add up the number of times they have triggered over the past year, the total just surpassed everything since July 2008.

Many technical warnings = weak returns

The only times the 1-year sum of these two technical warnings has reached this level were ahead of the Nasdaq peaks in 1990, 2000, and 2007. Which isn't great.

If we look at the maximum gains and losses across time frames, the Nasdaq did manage to spurt another +29% before peaking during the internet bubble, while the other two saw less than +10% upside.

A sample size of three is hard to have much confidence in, so if we relax the parameters to 35 signals over a year, we double the sample. Overall, the results were still weak, with each preceding some kind of trouble. This total was exceeded in March of this year, so if the April weakness was "it" for this cycle, it would be among the most unscathed.

Relaxing the parameters to 30 or more signals over a year gives us a few more dates. Only one of those, in 1996, got by without much trouble, though the Nasdaq still sported a negative return three months later. All the others led to trouble, though again, the internet bubble delayed the pain by a long while, and anyone selling short would have suffered losses by being way too early.

What the research tells us...

Divergences are building across the market, but they're particularly egregious on the Nasdaq exchange and within some indexes like the Nasdaq 100. It is not pound-the-table obvious just yet, but one of the issues is that warnings have been piling up for months and months.

When these conditions have been this pervasive, there have been essentially no instances when the Nasdaq didn't escape a reckoning. It didn't necessarily happen immediately, and several times, the stocks were able to tack on substantial gains in the weeks (or even months) afterward. But it was rare to escape any damage whatsoever.


Indicators at Extremes

Click here to view on the site (% Extremes and "Excess" tabs on the dashboard).
% Showing Pessimism: 14%
Bullish for Stocks

Inverse ETF Volume
Short-term Optimism Index (Optix)
NYSE High/Low Ratio
NYSE Up Volume Ratio
NYSE Up Issues Ratio
S&P 500 Down Pressure
OEX Put/Call Ratio
CSFB Fear Barometer
Mutual Fund Flow (no ETFs)
% Showing Optimism: 39%
Bearish for Stocks

Smart Money / Dumb Money Confidence Spread
Smart Money Confidence
Dumb Money Confidence
% Showing Excess Optimism
Intermediate Term Optimism Index (Optix)
VIX
AIM (Advisor and Investor Model)
Rydex Money Market %
Rydex Ratio
Rydex Bearish Flow
Retail Money Market Ratio
SKEW Index
Options Speculation Index
Equity Hedging Index
Risk Appetite Index
NAAIM Exposure Index
AAII Bull Ratio
Major Index Combo
NYSE Available Cash
AAII Allocation - Stocks
Equity / Money Market Asset Ratio
Mutual Fund Cash Level

Phase Table

Click here to view the Phase Table on the site.

Ranks

Click here to view on the site (Ranks tab on the Dashboard).

Sentiment Around The World

Click here to view on the site.

Optimism Index Thumbnails

Sector ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Country ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Bond ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Currency ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average
Commodity ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average
PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.