Indicators &
Backtest Tools
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Strategies
& Scanner
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Daily Report : What the Treasury Bear Flattener may mean for stocks and other assets

Jason Goepfert
2022-01-27
The quick rise in Treasury yields, especially on the short end of the curve, has pushed us into a Bear Flattener regime. During those periods, the S&P 500 has showed the weakest growth. Other assets haven't done much better. Real Estate, Financials, and Value stocks have typically performed the best.
View/Print a PDF version of this Report

Headlines


What the Treasury Bear Flattener may mean for stocks and other assets: The quick rise in Treasury yields, especially on the short end of the curve, has pushed us into a Bear Flattener regime. During those periods, the S&P 500 has showed the weakest growth. Other assets haven't done much better. Real Estate, Financials, and Value stocks have typically performed the best.

Smart / Dumb Money Confidence

Smart Money Confidence: 74% Dumb Money Confidence: 23%

Risk Levels

Stocks Short-Term

Stocks Medium-Term

Bonds

Crude Oil

Gold

Agriculture

Research

What the Treasury Bear Flattener may mean for stocks and other assets

By Jason Goepfert

BOTTOM LINE
The quick rise in Treasury yields, especially on the short end of the curve, has pushed us into a Bear Flattener regime. During those periods, the S&P 500 has showed the weakest growth. Other assets haven't done much better. Real Estate, Financials, and Value stocks have typically performed the best.

FORECAST / TIMEFRAME
None

Key points:

  • U.S. Treasury yields are rising, and 2-year maturities more than 10-year
  • That points to a Bear Flattener regime
  • During those regimes, the S&P 500 has showed the worst performance, as have other assets

Treasury yield regime points to Bear Flattener

This is going to get dangerously close to a macro note, which I try to avoid. There are much better sources out there for data and opinions on Fed moves, economic trends, and potential implications.

But the move in 2-year Treasury notes after the FOMC meeting on Wednesday seemed to significantly dampen investor sentiment in equities. The gyration in Treasuries has been dramatic. Yields have skyrocketed, especially on the short end of maturities, and especially especially on Wednesday, with the biggest jump in 2-year yields in almost a year.

The fact that 2-year yields rose more than 10-year yields means that the yield curve got flatter. When a flattening occurs because the yield short-term maturities rises faster than longer-term maturities, it's considered to be a Bear Flattener. This is usually taken as a negative for stock investors because it means money is getting more expensive for consumers and businesses, and the Federal Reserve may be on the cusp of making it even more expensive, potentially triggering a recession.

There are innumerable ways to measure this, using different parts of the curve and different time frames. For our purposes, we're going to look at 2-year and 10-year Treasury yields and their changes from 3 months ago. That is not optimized at all. We chose those maturities because they are the most commonly referenced ones and a 3-month time frame seemed to be a reasonable compromise between being too sensitive and not sensitive enough to market movements.

Regime2-Year Yield Trend10-Year Yield Trend2-Year vs. 10-Year% of Time
Bull FlattenerNegativeNegativeRising More24%
Bear FlattenerPositivePositiveRising More31%
Bull SteepenerNegativeNegativeDeclining More26%
Bear SteepenerPositivePositiveDeclining More19%


Since late October, 2-year yields have jumped 71 basis points while 10-year yields have risen 24 basis points. Since both are positive, and 2-year yields rose more than 10-year yields, it's in the Bear Flattener regime. This has been the most common regime, occurring on 31% of the days since 1976.

Markets (especially stocks), don't perform well during Bear Flatteners

The chart below shows the growth of $10,000 (using next-day returns) based on which regime the Treasury curve was indicating at the close of each trading day. Through 2000, the S&P 500 showed the best returns, by far, during a Bull Steepener regime, when yields were declining and 2-years more than 10-years.

Since 1976, the worst regime has been a Bear Flattener, which unfortunately is where we find ourselves now. Like we saw with the McClellan Summation Index when it's below zero and declining, this kind of regime has resulted in almost no gains over nearly 50 years. Over the past 20 years, it has produced a net loss.

We've been stuck in a Bear Flattener for the past 2 months, or 42 trading days. The table below shows how the S&P 500 performed going forward once we'd gone this long into the regime.

It's not like returns were terrible, they just weren't very good. Over the past 20 years, the S&P's performance was "meh" over a medium- to long-term time frame. Only a few of them ended up preceding imminent, and lengthy, bear markets or extreme volatility.

Among other markets, nothing really stood out, with most suffering losses over the short- to medium-term.

Sector and factor performance showed that Discretionary and Growth stocks suffered among the worst returns, with Technology not far behind. Among the winners, Real Estate, Financials, and Value stocks stood out the most.

What the research tells us...

I have no idea how long the current move in Treasuries will last, what impact the Federal Reserve will have on this market, or many of the broader implications. From a pure current price and yield perspective, we're seeing what has been among the least accommodative regimnes for stocks and most other assets. As long as that's the case, stocks may struggle, especially the more speculative ones that have been such a focus over the past year.


Active Studies

Click here to view the Active Research on the site.
Time FrameBullishBearish
Short-Term30
Medium-Term132
Long-Term145

Indicators at Extremes

Click here to view on the site (% Extremes and "Excess" tabs on the dashboard).
% Showing Pessimism: 30%
Bullish for Stocks

Smart Money / Dumb Money Confidence Spread
Smart Money Confidence
Inverse ETF Volume
S&P 500 Down Pressure
Short-term Optimism Index (Optix)
NYSE Up Issues Ratio
Dumb Money Confidence
% Showing Excess Pessimism
Intermediate Term Optimism Index (Optix)
VIX
VIX Term Structure
NYSE High/Low Ratio
Rydex Bearish Flow
Risk Appetite Index
AAII Bull Ratio
SPY Liquidity Premium
Equity Put/Call Ratio De-Trended
AIM (Advisor and Investor Model)
Equity Hedging Index
% Showing Optimism: 18%
Bearish for Stocks

Rydex Money Market %
Rydex Ratio
SKEW Index
OEX Open Interest Ratio
Options Speculation Index
NYSE Available Cash
AAII Allocation - Stocks
Retail Money Market Ratio
Equity / Money Market Asset Ratio
Mutual Fund Cash Level
VIX Transform

Portfolio

PositionDescriptionWeight %Added / ReducedDate
StocksRSP10.8Reduced 9.1%2022-01-20
Bonds32.7% BND, 7.1% SCHP40.1Added 8.3%2021-10-26
CommoditiesGCC2.4Reduced 2.1%
2020-09-04
Precious MetalsGDX4.6Reduced 4.2%2021-05-19
Special Situations8.1% KWEB, 3.6% XLE, 1.7% PSCE13.4Reduced 3.9%2022-01-18
Cash28.0
Updates (Changes made today are underlined)

Not impressed at all with the market action since there was a breadth thrust at the end of December, with selling pressure hitting consistently since then. The drawdown is beyond what we've typically seen after similar thrusts. More and more indicators are showing risk-off sentiment, and the market environment is sketchy. I've reduced risk because of it.

Bond sentiment is trying to recover from a recent bout of pessimism, and gold stocks are doing their thing which is not much at all. They've been flat for six months. Chinese tech stocks were doing exactly what they're supposed to do, then did *not* by plunging to new lows. This is troubling on a shorter-term time frame, but this was never meant for a trade, rather a multi-year investment. Recent behavior is troubling and I will not be adding any exposure as long as that's the case.

RETURN YTD:  -1.8%

2021: +8.7%,  2020: +8.1%, 2019: +12.6%, 2018: +0.6%, 2017: +3.8%, 2016: +17.1%, 2015: +9.2%, 2014: +14.5%, 2013: +2.2%, 2012: +10.8%, 2011: +16.5%, 2010: +15.3%, 2009: +23.9%, 2008: +16.2%, 2007: +7.8%

Phase Table

Click here to view the Phase Table on the site.

Ranks

Click here to view on the site (Ranks tab on the Dashboard).

Sentiment Around The World

Click here to view on the site.

Optimism Index Thumbnails

Sector ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Country ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Bond ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Currency ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average
Commodity ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
Indicators & Backtest Tools
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
Strategies & Scanner
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2025 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.