Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Daily Report : Technical warnings on par with prior peaks

Jason Goepfert
2022-01-18
During the past 6 months, there have been numerous days when 52-week lows outnumbered 52-week highs, only days following new highs in indexes like the S&P 500. These kinds of cluster of technical warning signs were seen near some important market peaks.
View/Print a PDF version of this Report

Headlines


Technical warnings on par with prior peaks: During the past 6 months, there have been numerous days when 52-week lows outnumbered 52-week highs, only days following new highs in indexes like the S&P 500. These kinds of cluster of technical warning signs were seen near some important market peaks.

Smart / Dumb Money Confidence

Smart Money Confidence: 57% Dumb Money Confidence: 44%

Risk Levels

Stocks Short-Term

Stocks Medium-Term

Bonds

Crude Oil

Gold

Agriculture

Research

Technical warnings on par with prior peaks

By Jason Goepfert

BOTTOM LINE
During the past 6 months, there have been numerous days when 52-week lows outnumbered 52-week highs, only days following new highs in indexes like the S&P 500. These kinds of cluster of technical warning signs were seen near some important market peaks.

FORECAST / TIMEFRAME
SPY -- Down, Long-Term

Key points:

  • Over the past 6 months, there has been a historic cluster of Titanic Syndrome technical warnings
  • It highlights an environment where more securities have been falling to 52-week lows than rising to 52-week highs
  • The only precedents in 40 years were 1999-00, 2007, and 2015

6 months of warning signs

Near the end of December, there was a surge in buying pressure in many stocks. That led to positive breadth thrusts in the S&P 500 and even among broader securities traded on the NYSE. Markets have not reacted well since, which is a worry.

From a longer-term point of view, there are other concerns. Over the past six months, there have been many days when indexes like the S&P 500 or Nasdaq Composite have reached a 52-week high. However, within mere days, more stocks and other securities were trading at 52-week lows than 52-week highs.

That type of behavior has triggered a cluster of Titanic Syndrome warnings for securities on the NYSE. Since November, there has been a rash of them, with isolated signals dating to last spring.

Those haven't just been firing on the NYSE. While fewer lately, there have also been a bunch of signals among securities traded on the Nasdaq.

When we combine the signals on both exchanges and tally them up over the past 6 months, there have been 34 signals. In other words, nearly 30% of all days since July have seen a Titanic Syndrome warning on either the NYSE or Nasdaq exchanges. This is the 3rd-highest reading in almost 40 years, next to 1999-2000 and 2007. Early 2015 is the only other environment that comes close.

Peaks in warnings have preceded weak returns

The 6-month rolling sum has just started to curl down, suggesting it may have peaked. After other peaks, the S&P 500 showed minimal upside.

We can see that more clearly in the Risk/Reward Table, which shows choppy conditions, at best, for the most benchmarked index in the world. Not one of the signals showed more than a 10% gain at any point within the next six months. Granted, the sample size is tiny.

After the same signals, returns in the Nasdaq Composite weren't exactly inspiring, either. While it managed some double-digit gains, its returns were highly volatile.

Some of the highest-beta sectors and factors fared the worst returns. Technology, Discretionary, and Growth stocks showed abysmal long-term returns. Staples, Energy, and Health Care showed among the best.

What the research tells us...

The tendency to see more securities falling to 52-week lows than rising to 52-week highs soon after major indexes themselves closed at new highs is disturbing. This kind of behavior has been going on for 6 months or more and is among the most egregious in 40 years. Other warnings of split market environments, like the Hindenburg Omens on the NYSE and Nasdaq, haven't triggered nearly as many times, so that's perhaps some small solace.


Active Studies

Click here to view the Active Research on the site.
Time FrameBullishBearish
Short-Term20
Medium-Term132
Long-Term135

Indicators at Extremes

Click here to view on the site (% Extremes and "Excess" tabs on the dashboard).
% Showing Pessimism: 15%
Bullish for Stocks

Inverse ETF Volume
S&P 500 Down Pressure
Short-term Optimism Index (Optix)
NYSE Up Issues Ratio
NYSE Up Volume Ratio
VIX
Rydex Bearish Flow
Equity Hedging Index
AAII Bull Ratio
% Showing Optimism: 22%
Bearish for Stocks

Rydex Money Market %
Rydex Ratio
SKEW Index
Options Speculation Index
OEX Open Interest Ratio
CSFB Fear Barometer
NAAIM Exposure Index
AAII Allocation - Stocks
Retail Money Market Ratio
NYSE Available Cash
Equity / Money Market Asset Ratio
Mutual Fund Cash Level
VIX Transform

Portfolio

PositionDescriptionWeight %Added / ReducedDate
StocksRSP19.9Reduced 16%2022-01-18
Bonds32.7% BND, 7.1% SCHP40.1Added 8.3%2021-10-26
CommoditiesGCC2.4Reduced 2.1%
2020-09-04
Precious MetalsGDX4.6Reduced 4.2%2021-05-19
Special Situations8.1% KWEB, 3.6% XLE, 1.7% PSCE13.4Reduced 3.9%2022-01-18
Cash19.4
Updates (Changes made today are underlined)

Not impressed at all with the market action since there was a breadth thrust at the end of December, with selling pressure hitting consistently since then. The drawdown is beyond what we've typically seen after similar thrusts. More and more indicators are showing risk-off sentiment, and the market environment is sketchy. I've reduced risk because of it.

Bond sentiment is trying to recover from a recent bout of pessimism, and gold stocks are doing their thing which is not much at all. They've been flat for six months. Chinese tech stocks were doing exactly what they're supposed to do, then did *not* by plunging to new lows. This is troubling on a shorter-term time frame, but this was never meant for a trade, rather a multi-year investment. Recent behavior is troubling and I will not be adding any exposure as long as that's the case.

RETURN YTD:  -0.5%

2021: +8.7%,  2020: +8.1%, 2019: +12.6%, 2018: +0.6%, 2017: +3.8%, 2016: +17.1%, 2015: +9.2%, 2014: +14.5%, 2013: +2.2%, 2012: +10.8%, 2011: +16.5%, 2010: +15.3%, 2009: +23.9%, 2008: +16.2%, 2007: +7.8%

Phase Table

Click here to view the Phase Table on the site.

Ranks

Click here to view on the site (Ranks tab on the Dashboard).

Sentiment Around The World

Click here to view on the site.

Optimism Index Thumbnails

Sector ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Country ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Bond ETF's - 10-Day Moving Average
Currency ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average
Commodity ETF's - 5-Day Moving Average

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.