Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Bear markets are rising in big tech

Jason Goepfert
2024-06-05
The tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 was recently hitting new highs, but more stocks in the index are falling by the wayside. The number of stocks falling more than 20% from their highs, the common definition of a bear market, continued to climb. Similar divergences preceded weak returns for the index except for the final blow-off in 1998-99.

Key points:

  • As the Nasdaq 100 recently closed at new highs, more stocks in the index were falling 20% from their highs
  • This is a severe divergence between the index and its component stocks, last seen in late 2021
  • Outside of the 1998-99 internet bubble blow-off, similar divergences preceded weak returns over the next few months

A bull market in bear markets

Last week, we saw that fewer stocks in the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (NDX) were holding above their 50-day and 200-day moving averages despite the index itself continuing to rise. Dean followed up yesterday with a different look but a similar conclusion.

The concern isn't just that fewer stocks are holding above their medium- and long-term moving averages. Maybe they're just a bit below, or maybe the averages are still rising. Those and other factors could mitigate the idea that there's a lot of damage under the surface.

One metric that can't be explained away is the number of stocks in bear markets. We use the common definition of a 20% drawdown from the most recent 52-week high as a bear market.

Oddly, more and more NDX stocks are falling into that definition. This is a change from the initial phase of the rally and is quite similar to the rally in the fall of 2021, when the index rose while more of its stocks fell into bear markets.

Over the past 25 years, there have been more than 100 trading days when a divergence like this has been in effect. These are days when the NDX closed at a 52-week high, yet at least 13% more stocks fell into bear markets than the lowest level over the past year. In other words, the index was rising, but more and more stocks were off more than 20% from their highs.

The summary table below shows that these were not necessarily reasons to sell tech stocks. The NDX's returns in the weeks and months ahead were fine and well above random up to six months later.

However, much of that was due to 1998-1999. During the final blow-off phase of the rally, divergences galore occurred, and the index continued to soar for months on end.

If we assume we're not on the cusp of a repeat and cut out that time frame, the table below shows a much less optimistic outlook. Even though the NDX continued to rally most of the time over the next couple of weeks, the rallies tended to sputter and showed mostly losses by three months later. The only signals that didn't show a loss were the ones from the beginning of 2012 when the NDX managed to rally for another couple of months before erasing all the gains in a subsequent correction.

The divergence signals could become more significant if forward returns are significantly different from those without divergence, as shown in the table below. Indeed, the Nasdaq 100 performed exceptionally well over the next 6-12 months when relatively few stocks were in bear markets, and the index was hitting new highs.

Since most of the late 1990s blow-off was accompanied by divergences, the table doesn't change much if we exclude that final bubble period. 

What the research tells us...

Warning signs have been building in recent weeks, particularly on the Nasdaq and, even more notably, among the tech stocks in the Nasdaq 100. The index has been doing just fine, but participation is lagging badly. These conditions can persist for weeks or even months, but forward returns over the medium term tend to be weak by the time they've reached the current levels.

We can see that again here, with the increase in stocks falling into bear markets. This is not typical behavior when an index is reaching new highs and has been a cause for concern over the past 20 years. The late bubble years were a short-seller's nightmare because nothing mattered for more than a year and double-digit returns, so bulls have to hope that the AI hype will serve as a repeat.

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.