Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Applying sentiment indicators to different models

Troy Bombardia
2019-12-04
null

2 months ago I looked at what would happen if you applied 8 different sentiment indicators to the unemployment rate model. This post takes that 1 step further.


2 sentiment indicators

I whittled down the 8 indicators and focused on the ones that have data from the 1960s-present.

Going through various combinations of these indicators demonstrates that combining the Stock/Bond ratio and NYSE HiLo Logic Index adds the most additional alpha and increases risk-adjusted returns. 

So with that being said, here's what happens when you apply the Stock/Bond ratio and NYSE HiLo Logic Index to the following models:

  1. Simple Trading Model With Fundamentals 
  2. Macro Index Model 
  3. Conference Board LEI Model 
  4. Dual Trend Model With Fundamentals

Here's how we apply these 2 sentiment indicators:

  1. If the original model says SELL stocks, then sell stocks and buy the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bonds Index.
  2. If the original model says BUY stocks, and neither "Stock/Bond ratio was >2.5 sometime over the past 2 months", nor "NYSE HiLo Logic Index's 10 dma was >3 sometime over the past 2 months", BUY stocks.
  3. If the original model says BUY stocks, and "Stock/Bond ratio was >2.5 sometime over the past 2 months", or "NYSE HiLo Logic Index's 10 dma was >3 sometime over the past 2 months", SELL stocks and buy the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bonds Index.

In a nutshell, follow the original model, but sell stocks and buy bonds if either of these 2 sentiment signals sent a bearish signal sometime over the past 2 months.


Simple Trading Model With Fundamentals + 2 sentiment indicators

Average annual returns

From December 30, 1988 - August 1, 2019:

  1. The original Simple Trading Model With Fundamentals has an average annual return of 11.87% per year
  2. Simple Trading Model With Fundamentals (+Stock/Bond ratio and NYSE HiLo Logic Index) has an average annual return of 13.44% per year

*These returns do not include the S&P 500's dividends reinvested. Including dividends reinvested, average annual returns would be higher.

Sharpe ratio

From December 30, 1988 - August 1, 2019:

  1. The original Simple Trading Model With Fundamentals has a Sharpe ratio of 0.67
  2. Simple Trading Model With Fundamentals (+Stock/Bond ratio and NYSE HiLo Logic Index) has a Sharpe ratio of 0.88

*These Sharpe ratios are lower than what you might expect, since they do not include the S&P 500's dividends reinvested. Including dividends reinvested, Sharpe would be higher.


Macro Index Model + 2 sentiment indicators

Average annual returns

From December 30, 1988 - August 1, 2019:

  1. The original Macro Index Model has an average annual return of 11.65% per year
  2. Macro Index Model (+Stock/Bond ratio and NYSE HiLo Logic Index) has an average annual return of 12.99% per year

*These returns do not include the S&P 500's dividends reinvested. Including dividends reinvested, average annual returns would be higher.

Sharpe ratio

From December 30, 1988 - August 1, 2019:

  1. The original Macro Index Model has a Sharpe ratio of 0.69
  2. Simple Trading Model With Fundamentals (+Stock/Bond ratio and NYSE HiLo Logic Index) has a Sharpe ratio of 0.87

*These Sharpe ratios are lower than what you might expect, since they do not include the S&P 500's dividends reinvested. Including dividends reinvested, Sharpe would be higher.


Conference Board LEI Model + 2 sentiment indicators

*This Conference Board LEI Model is a little different from what I described here. In the following version of the Conference Board LEI Model, the rules are as follows:

*Thank you to Daniel - one of our subscribers - who emailed me about this

  1. Buy and hold the S&P 500, unless...
  2. The Conference Board LEI's 6 month rate-of-change is negative, AND the S&P is below its 12 month moving average.


Average annual returns

From December 30, 1988 - August 1, 2019:

  1. The original Conference Board LEI Model has an average annual return of 10.99% per year
  2. Conference Board LEI Model (+Stock/Bond ratio and NYSE HiLo Logic Index) has an average annual return of 12.4% per year

*These returns do not include the S&P 500's dividends reinvested. Including dividends reinvested, average annual returns would be higher.

Sharpe ratio

From December 30, 1988 - August 1, 2019:

  1. The original Conference Board LEI Model has a Sharpe ratio of 0.6
  2. Conference Board LEI Model (+Stock/Bond ratio and NYSE HiLo Logic Index) has a Sharpe ratio of 0.77

*These Sharpe ratios are lower than what you might expect, since they do not include the S&P 500's dividends reinvested. Including dividends reinvested, Sharpe would be higher.


Dual Trend Model With Fundamentals + 2 sentiment indicators

Average annual returns

From December 30, 1988 - August 1, 2019:

  1. The original Dual Trend Model With Fundamentals has an average annual return of 18.53% per year
  2. Dual Trend Model With Fundamentals (+Stock/Bond ratio and NYSE HiLo Logic Index) has an average annual return of 18.4% per year

*These returns do not include the S&P 500's dividends reinvested. Including dividends reinvested, average annual returns would be higher.

Sharpe ratio

From December 30, 1988 - August 1, 2019:

  1. The original Dual Trend Model With Fundamentals has a Sharpe ratio of 0.92
  2. Dual Trend Model With Fundamentals (+Stock/Bond ratio and NYSE HiLo Logic Index) has a Sharpe ratio of 1.02

*These Sharpe ratios are lower than what you might expect, since they do not include the S&P 500's dividends reinvested. Including dividends reinvested, Sharpe would be higher.


Now what if we used the S&P 500's total return data?


Simple Trading Model With Fundamentals + 2 sentiment indicators

Average annual returns

From December 30, 1988 - August 1, 2019:

  1. The original Simple Trading Model With Fundamentals has an average annual return of 13.98% per year
  2. Simple Trading Model With Fundamentals (+Stock/Bond ratio and NYSE HiLo Logic Index) has an average annual return of 14.97% per year

Sharpe ratio

From December 30, 1988 - August 1, 2019:

  1. The original Simple Trading Model With Fundamentals has a Sharpe ratio of 0.81
  2. Simple Trading Model With Fundamentals (+Stock/Bond ratio and NYSE HiLo Logic Index) has a Sharpe ratio of 0.99


Macro Index Model + 2 sentiment indicators

Average annual returns

From December 30, 1988 - August 1, 2019:

  1. The original Macro Index Model has an average annual return of 13.38% per year
  2. Macro Index Model (+Stock/Bond ratio and NYSE HiLo Logic Index) has an average annual return of 14.28% per year

Sharpe ratio

From December 30, 1988 - August 1, 2019:

  1. The original Macro Index Model has a Sharpe ratio of 0.81
  2. Simple Trading Model With Fundamentals (+Stock/Bond ratio and NYSE HiLo Logic Index) has a Sharpe ratio of 0.97


Conference Board LEI Model + 2 sentiment indicators

Average annual returns

From December 30, 1988 - August 1, 2019:

  1. The original Conference Board LEI Model has an average annual return of 13.11% per year
  2. Conference Board LEI Model (+Stock/Bond ratio and NYSE HiLo Logic Index) has an average annual return of 13.96% per year

Sharpe ratio

From December 30, 1988 - August 1, 2019:

  1. The original Conference Board LEI Model has a Sharpe ratio of 0.74
  2. Conference Board LEI Model (+Stock/Bond ratio and NYSE HiLo Logic Index) has a Sharpe ratio of 0.88


*I'm unable to backtest the Dual Trend Model With Fundamentals using total return data since the NASDAQ's total return data history is limited.


Conclusion

Incorporating the Stock/Bond ratio and NYSE HiLo Logic Index adds significant alpha to trading models and increases their Sharpe ratios. These aren't the only sentiment indicators that add alpha - this post seeks to demonstrate that combining several sentiment indicators to different models adds alpha and increases risk-adjusted returns, regardless of which model you apply these sentiment indicators to.

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.