Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Another round of options records

Jason Goepfert
2022-10-10
Large, institutional options traders once again spent a record amount of premiums buying protective put options as a hedge against further stock declines. Even accounting for offsetting call buying and relative to market value, the only week with similar activity was the one ending October 10, 2008.

Key points:

  • Once again last week, institutional options traders placed record bets against individual stocks
  • Even accounting for offsetting trades and market size, last week's bets have only one precedent
  • That other week of panic, in October 2008, preceded a 20% rally that ultimately failed

Large traders once again buy record bets against stocks

Institutional traders have not given up betting on a crash. So far, it seems to be working for them.

Last week, the largest options traders in the market spent more than $10 billion on buying put options to open on individual equities. That is, by far, a record high and is nearing an all-time record spent by any group of traders on any options strategy ever.

We often criticize those who only look at one side of the ledger and who don't take context into account. So let's incorporate the other side, which is the amount these traders spent buying call options to open. If we net those two out, last week's activity is still far beyond anything seen before. It's a mirror image of the end of October 2021, when speculative excess was in full force.

Now, for context. As a percentage of the total market capitalization of U.S. stocks, last week's put buying was still quite a bit below October 2008.

But when we net out the speculative activity and express it relative to market capitalization - the most honest, objective way to view this data - it's on par with the week ending October 10, 2008.

For some context, here are a few quotes in the mainstream media from that week:

From CNN Money:

And NBC:

And ABC:

If we zoom in on that week, it wasn't the exact low for stocks. From the low of that week, the S&P 500 jumped nearly 20% over the next 17 trading days. But then panic resumed anew, and the index fell nearly 12% from its October low into late November, and its ultimate low didn't occur for 100 days, and another 20% loss.

There is some evidence that the activity we're seeing now is even more speculative (on the downside) than that from 2008. As the Wall Street Journal noted recently:

Options contracts that expire in less than a week make up about half of all activity in the U.S.-listed options market, according to the derivatives-analytics firm SpotGamma. That is up from around 45% last year and roughly a third of all activity in 2019.

"Speculators love them," said Steve Sosnick, chief market strategist at the electronic brokerage Interactive Brokers, on options with the shortest expiries. "If you're speculating, you don't necessarily want to think about the move in three months-you want to think of the move tomorrow."

When we see heavy activity in highly leveraged, extremely short-term instruments, it signifies excessive confidence among the traders. One thing that markets will teach all of us is that excessive confidence is a recipe for humility.

What the research tells us...

Not all indicators agree, ever. I distinctly remember March 2009, when analysts said that stocks couldn't possibly bottom because put/call ratios were showing too many bets on a rebound. That's why we prefer to use weight-of-the-evidence and rely more on composite models and objective testing. We saw last week that sentiment conditions are ripe for a counter-trend move, and then there was a historic thrust that strongly tends to lead to higher prices. All of those are over a medium- to long-term time frame, and short-term volatility is expected. A sustained decline from these conditions would most assuredly not be.

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.