Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

A rare week with uninterrupted technical warnings

Jason Goepfert
2025-03-03
The Titanic Syndrome technical warning sign was triggered every day for a week on the NYSE and the Nasdaq exchanges. This is a rare cluster of signals that has preceded poor returns across major stock indices. The only stocks that tended to see positive returns were defensive in nature, like staples and utilities.

Key points:

  • The Titanic Syndrome technical warning was triggered on the NYSE every day for a week
  • It has also triggered on the Nasdaq for 5 straight days, a rare cluster across exchanges
  • Previous clusters of warnings have preceded poor returns for stocks, except for defensive sectors

A cluster of warnings

Investors have been willing to sell stocks en masse, pushing many to new lows soon after the major indices were sitting pretty at new highs.

Maybe it's just a temporary temper tantrum based on geopolitics or a re-rating of GDP growth or tariff threats. But maybe not. Maybe it's something deeper.

Some internal warning signals have fired due to the quick flip in sentiment - the Titanic Syndrome warning was triggered on the NYSE for five consecutive days before easing on Friday. Forget the stupid name of the indicator; it simply highlights a technical market condition when stocks have recently been at a high, and then there is a sudden jump in new 52-week lows versus highs on the NYSE.

The chart below shows a 5-day average of the signals. If the average equals 1, it triggered every day for a week. We can see how rare it has been over the past decade; each time, it preceded trouble.

We wrote about a cluster of these signals in January 2022, which provided a valuable heads-up. As we can see from the table below, clusters of these signals have preceded ill returns for the S&P 500 across most time frames, especially shorter-term. Within the following two months, the S&P lost at least -5% seven times while gaining more than +5% only twice.

Warnings on both primary exchanges

These signals have triggered not only on the NYSE but also on the Nasdaq exchange. For only the 3rd time in 40 years, the combined Titanic warnings across both exchanges have totaled ten in the past week. That means the warning was triggered on both exchanges every day for a week.

The other two clusters saw the S&P struggle to hold any upside momentum in the weeks ahead, providing investors a poor risk/reward profile.

It's tough to rely on such a minuscule sample size, so the table below expands the sample to look for clusters of eight or more signals on the two exchanges. These clusters continued to precede poor returns for the S&P in the weeks ahead, and even over the following year, average risk was higher than average reward. Within the next three months, the S&P lost more than -10% four times while never gaining more than +10%.

A bad sign for indices, with defensive stocks an exception

The other major indices also tended to suffer, with the Nasdaq Composite and Russell 2000 bearing the brunt over shorter time frames. Up to six months later, average returns were poor across all the indices. The VIX "fear gauge" tended to spike over the next couple of weeks due to that tendency to see selling pressure.

Defensive-oriented sectors like consumer staples and utilities were the only consistent ports in the storm across time frames. They stood out among all sectors as having positive returns over time. Higher-beta sectors like consumer discretionary and technology tended to sell off the most short term and rebound harder over longer time frames.

We can see this pattern in the win rate among sectors. As they progressed from the most defensive to the most cyclical, sectors tended to see lower and lower win rates across time frames. 

What the research tells us...

A late rebound on Friday saved the markets from generating another Titanic syndrome warning, but that didn't prevent it from triggering every day for a week straight. It's unusual to see such a warning sign persist for a week straight on one exchange, and it's almost unprecedented to see it across two.

It has been beneficial for investors to become more defensive when clusters of warnings pop up like this. Whether that means raising cash, shifting to more defensive sectors, or simply being less aggressive with new buys, it has tended to help returns over short and intermediate time frames. That's something to consider as we endure yet another round of warning clusters. About the only bright spot is that another technical warning, the Hindenburg Omen, has not consistently triggered on the NYSE, though it has on the Nasdaq for months.

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.