Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

A put/call ratio trading model triggers a buy signal for the energy sector

Dean Christians
2023-10-16
A trading model that monitors the aggregated put/call ratio for the Energy sector ETF (XLE) triggered a new buy signal. After similar alerts, the sector was higher 92% of the time over the following two months.

Key points:

  • The put/call ratio for the energy sector surged and subsequently reversed low, triggering a buy signal
  • Similar shifts in sentiment led to excellent returns and win rates for the energy sector ETF (XLE)
  • Absolute and relative trend score rankings for the energy sector suggest an improving backdrop

Measuring shifts in sentiment with the aggregated put/call ratio

Investors opt for call options to wager on price increases in bullish stock uptrends. Conversely, during bearish market conditions, they prefer put contracts to speculate or hedge against falling stock values. The put/call ratio can be used as a contrary indicator to identify when sentiment amongst traders has become too optimistic or pessimistic. When the sentiment pendulum swings too far one way, a market will likely snap back in the other direction.

A trading model that monitors the aggregated put/call ratio for the Energy ETF (XLE) surged, indicating fear amongst energy traders. Subsequently, it reversed lower, triggering a buy signal.

A trading model that identifies a reversal in the aggregated put/call ratio

The put/call ratio trading model applies an 84-day range rank to a 10-day moving average of the XLE aggregated put/call ratio. A pessimistic reset condition becomes active when the range rank indicator climbs above the 99th percentile. Once confirmed, a new buy signal triggers after the range rank falls below the 57th percentile and market momentum for the XLE ETF turns positive in five sessions or fewer.

Similar aggregated put/call ratio signals preceded positive returns

While the sample size is small due to limited data, results are excellent despite several signals occurring in extremely unfavorable conditions. The previous signal is the only precedent to show a loss at the two-month horizon. However, that alert displayed a max gain of 6.4% in the first month before faltering.

Risk reward was favorable over the following two months, with 11 out of 13 signals showing a max gain that exceeded the max loss.

The energy sector is near the top of the absolute and relative trend score rankings

Last week, the absolute and relative trend scores for the S&P 500 energy sector ETF (XLE) jumped five and six points, respectively. And it's the only sector to maintain a rising 50 and 200-day moving average.

The equal-weighted S&P 500 energy sector ETF (RSPG) is the only group to maintain a positive absolute and relative strength score versus the cap-weighted index. 

When I searched back to 1960, I found only one instance in history when the equal-weighted energy sector had a positive relative trend score, with all the other sectors exhibiting a negative profile. That precedent occurred in January 1973.

Similar to the large-cap equal-weighted sector trends, the small-cap energy sector looks favorable versus the S&P 500 and really stands out compared to other groups within the small-cap space. 

Within industry group ETFs, energy and insurance maintain a favorable profile versus the S&P 500 in an otherwise weak backdrop for most groups. 

What the research tells us...

The aggregated put/call ratio for the Energy sector surged higher, indicating fear amongst traders. It has subsequently reversed lower, triggering a buy signal for a trading model that monitors shifts in sentiment. Similar reversals led to excellent returns and win rates regardless of the market environment, highlighting the efficacy of sentiment-based indicators like the put/call ratio. With the upswing in energy stock prices, the sector's absolute and relative trend scores have improved, suggesting a more favorable backdrop.

While the put/call trading model has an excellent historical record, one must acknowledge that the turmoil in the Middle East impacted crude oil and energy stocks bullishly. So, this time could be different.

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.