Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

A challenging global investment landscape

Dean Christians
2024-01-17
On Tuesday, the percentage of country ETFs with a positive relative trend score compared to the S&P 500 dropped to less than 5%, hitting the lowest point since December 2021. After similar signals, the MSCI World ex USA Index struggled, and the S&P 500 showed muted returns.

Key points:

  • The percentage of country ETFs with a positive relative trend score versus the S&P 500 fell to a multi-year low  
  • Similar relative trend conditions suggest a cautious outlook for the MSCI World ex USA Index
  • The S&P 500 tended to outperform the MSCI World ex USA Index, but returns were lackluster

It's the S&P 500 and not much else

Last week, I highlighted a historic breadth thrust alert for the Nikkei 225, which displayed bullish implications for the Japanese bellwether index. While the price action in Japanese stocks looks constructive, one can't make the same case for most country indexes around the globe compared to the S&P 500.

On Tuesday, the percentage of global indexes with a positive relative trend score versus the S&P 500 fell to fewer than 5% of country ETFs, reaching the lowest value since December 2021.

India and Argentina remain the only ETFs with a positive relative trend score compared to the S&P 500. While most countries show downward revisions in relative trend scores, Poland, Brazil, Mexico, Finland, Australia, Canada, and Italy were significant. And one-month relative lows overwhelmingly outnumbered relative highs across the globe.

Global indexes are struggling to keep up with the S&P 500

With the percentage of country ETFs maintaining a positive relative trend score falling to one of the lowest levels in history, investors should remember that negative relative trends, like now, can often foreshadow weak absolute performance, as exhibited by the -22.95 annualized return for the MSCI World ex USA Index.

Similar relative trend conditions suggest a negative to muted outlook

When I utilize a cross-below-threshold methodology to assess the outlook for the MSCI World ex USA Index, the analysis suggests a negative near-term outlook followed by muted returns over a median-term horizon. The unfavorable win rate and median return over the following year demonstrate that the signal tends to manifest during prolonged corrections and bear markets.  

While the S&P 500 shows more favorable returns and win rates than the global benchmark, the z-score reveals lackluster performance compared to any random time. So, we must be mindful that when relative trends around the globe deteriorate, like now, passive investors could experience muted returns.

The percentage of country ETFs outperforming the S&P 500 over a rolling one-year period recently declined below 10%, indicating the dominance of the world's most benchmarked index compared to everything else. Similar conditions produced negative annualized returns for the MSCI World ex USA Index. 

Do domestic relative trends confirm the global message?

Because country ETF weightings heavily favor value-oriented stocks, let's review sector and industry trends to see if the deterioration in the global landscape is being confirmed domestically. 

While Financials remain healthy, relative trend scores for Industrials and Materials have recently fallen, with both groups registering an abundance of relative lows over the past week.

Similar to the cap-weighted trends, Financials are the only value-based group to maintain a positive relative trend score compared to the S&P 500. The noticeable downshift in relative scores for equal-weighted sectors is a concern, as the significant market surge in Q4 2023 suggested a broadening in participation. 

Industry rankings provide a similar message; outside of growth, it's predominantly Financials and Home Construction exhibiting positive relative trends.

What the research tells us...

The percentage of country ETFs with a positive relative trend score has fallen to a multi-year low, indicating broad underperformance by global indexes compared to the S&P 500. Similar relative trend conditions often foreshadow an unfavorable outlook for the MSCI World ex USA Index. When the world catches a cold, it tends to impact the S&P 500, with the world's most benchmarked index displaying lackluster returns. With global indexes in the penalty box, value-oriented sectors could struggle. 

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.