Indicators &
Backtest Tools
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Strategies
& Scanner
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

The volatility of everything is spiking

Jason Goepfert
2022-03-07
Over the past week, implied volatility across assets has spiked. It's at or near the highest in a year in stocks, bonds, currencies, gold, and oil, only the 11th simultaneous cross-asset volatility spike since 1990. Other spikes tended to see stocks and the dollar rally in the months ahead, while gold fell.

Key points:

  • Implied volatilities in stocks, bonds, currencies, gold, and oil are all spiking
  • This is only the 11th cross-asset volatility spike in 30 years
  • After similar behavior, stocks and the dollar tended to rally while gold and oil fell

Traders are pricing in volatility spikes...everywhere

We saw last week that while investors are pessimistic (especially in stocks), they're not panicking. When true panic grips markets, it's usually reflected in credit, and it's just not happening to any great degree yet.

That's not to say there isn't volatility. There is, and it's everywhere.

Options traders price in rising volatility in stocks almost exclusively when they're declining. That's when investors panic. But in other markets, from bonds to FX to commodities, implied volatility just as often spikes when prices are rising quickly as when they're falling. When volatility across assets spikes at the same time, you know some crazy sh** is going down.

That's what's happening right now-for one of the few times in history, implied volatility in stocks, bonds, currencies, gold, and oil is spiking simultaneously. This is one of only a handful of times that every market is seeing the highest (or nearly the highest) volatility in the past year. The chart below shows volatility expectations for each market as a percentage of their one-year ranges.

The average volatility gauge across markets is in the top 2% of their yearly ranges. That's an incredible bout of cross-asset concern that we've rarely seen in the past 30 years.

Volatility spikes tend to be good for stocks and the dollar, bad for gold and oil

For the S&P 500, these bouts of high anxiety across markets have preceded excellent medium-term returns. The only real exceptions, unfortunately, were the last two. While it preceded a significant relief rally early in 2008, when it triggered again in October of that year, the final melt-down phase of the Global Financial Crisis was in full force. The same happened during the pandemic crash. 

However, during other crises, it proved to be a good buying trigger for stocks, at least for a multi-week to multi-month rebound (including the Russian devaluation in 1998).

For bonds, it was more of a mixed picture. The futures on 10-year Treasuries showed inconsistent gains, though there was a slight positive correlation between short-term and long-term returns. If investors bid up Treasury prices in the week(s) after these volatility spikes, it was a better sign for their long-term prospects as well.

The dollar has often served as a safe-haven vehicle along with Treasuries, and several of these cross-asset volatility spikes coincided with a  rising dollar. The buck tended to keep going in the months ahead, showing a positive return over the next 2 months after 8 of the 10 signals.

Gold is considered a good place to park "the world is going to hell" bets, and most of these crises saw the metal being bid up in the weeks prior. Unfortunately for gold bugs, it had a heck of a time holding onto those gains. Either 1 or 2 months later, gold sported a negative return every time.

Crude oil also had trouble holding gains from these volatility spikes, especially in recent decades. This market, in particular, is subject to booms and busts based on supply/demand and geopolitical machinations and is the least subject to historical analysis because of it.

What the research tells us...

The Panic Button indicators we looked at last week are climbing quickly - it's up to 0.5 from 0.0 last week. But that's still far below all-out credit panic readings of 3.5 and above. That's not necessarily bad because investors do NOT want credit markets to sow panic. If and when they do, it's typically only during waterfall crashes. While investors are highly anxious, so far, the damage is relatively constrained, which should be a good thing from a multi-month point of view. 

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
Indicators & Backtest Tools
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
Strategies & Scanner
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.