Data &
Technology
Research
Reports
Report Solutions
Reports Library
Actionable
Strategies
Free
Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Free Webinar
Pricing
Company
About
Meet Our Team
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

NYSE 52-Week High-Low Ratio Risk-Off Model

Dean Christians
2021-04-07
Let's review a TCTM Risk Warning Model component that utilizes NYSE 52-week new highs and lows to identify a risk-off environment.

In my note on Tuesday, I reviewed the S&P 500 New Low Spike Model and discussed the importance of monitoring the new lows list when the broad market is advancing. I also shared why I prefer S&P 500 and NYSE exchange lows versus other indexes and exchanges. In my note today, I plan to review an additional risk warning model component that utilizes NYSE 52-week highs and lows to identify risk-off periods.

Components

1.) Number of NYSE 52-Week Highs

2.) Number of NYSE 52-Week Lows

NYSE 52-Week High Low Ratio Risk-Off Model

The NYSE 52-week high low ratio model seeks to identify instances in history when new lows exceed new highs by a ratio of 1.5 or greater when the S&P 500 index is trading within two days of a 252-day high. The model will issue an alert based upon the following conditions.

Signal Criteria

Condition1 = NYSE new lows/new highs ratio >= 1.5.

Condition2 = S&P 500 Index <= 2 days from a 252-day high.

Condition3 = NYSE new lows/new highs ratio cross above 1.0. i.e., the reset screens out duplicate signals.

Edit: the original note said 1.0% in condition 3. That was a typo. The ratio should cross back above 1.0.

If Condition 1-3, signal risk-off.

Let's take a look at some charts and the historical signal performance.

Current Day Chart

Please note, I calculate performance statistics in the chart as a short signal, whereas annualized returns result from buying the S&P 500.

2015-16 Oil/Commodity Bear

2000 Internet Bubble

1990 Savings & Loan/Iraq Oil Spike

1980 Energy/Commodity Bubble

1973-74 Bretton Woods/Nixon Shock/Oil Crisis

1957-58 Bear Market

1929-32 Bear Market 

Signal Performance

As one can see, performance is weak across all timeframes with a notable z-score in the 2-week timeframe.

Historical TCTM Risk Warning Model Table

Conclusion: While the ratio of new lows to new highs recently exceeded the threshold level in late March due to a downdraft in speculative stocks, the model did not trigger as the two-day from the high condition was not valid.  

Sorry, you don't have access to this report

Upgrade your subscription plan to get access
Go to Dasboard
DATA &
TECHnologies
IndicatorEdge
‍
BackTestEdge
‍
Other Tools
‍
DataEdge API
RESEARCH
reports
Research Solution
‍
Reports Library
‍
actionable
Strategies
Trading Strategies
‍
Smart Stock Scanner
‍
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Free Webinar
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
Meet our Team
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
Announcements
‍
FAQ
© 2024 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: Futures and forex trading contains substantial risk and is not for every investor. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.