May 18, 2010, 7:45am EST   

 Print Report    Leave a comment     Previous Day's Report     Archive  

 

Go to:  Top  |  Short-term Outlook  |  Int-term Outlook  |  Equity Updates  |  Indicator Summary  |  Commodity Updates

 
Tuesday's Need-To-Know  

Smart / Dumb Money Confidence

 

* Yesterday's (possible) successful re-test of the panic lows and intraday reversal bar tends to have positive short-term implications, but the edge isn't very large and doesn't last more than a couple of days.  The S&P just barely missed closing the price gap created on May 10th.

 

* We've looked at quite a few bullish intermediate-term studies over the past week, but nothing much was longer-term than 1-3 months.  Given the current state of large- vs small-money traders, though, that could be quite bullish as well (according to Yale).

 

 

The Dumb Money is 46% confident in a rally.

The Smart Money is 42% confident in a rally.

 

Smart/Dumb Confidence

View longer history

 

 

Short-term Outlook (1-5 Days):  25% Bearish  From May 14, 1150 SPX

 

 

 

Recent Studies:

Post-crash trading patterns (5/07): Mixed

 

What:  We will move to neutral if the S&P 500 cash index trades at 1163 or 1110.

 

Why:  Yesterday I mentioned that I've been looking for a move down to 1115-1120 as the most likely target for a "retest" of the panic lows.  While the pre-market futures on Monday dipped to 1120, a more "pure" closing of the huge price gap from May 10th would only occur during regular trading hours.  The S&P managed to kiss that 1115 level almost exactly before rebounding strongly into the close.  That creates a dilemma - it clearly hit the target price to be considered a re-test of the panic low, but it just missed closing that price gap.  Maybe we're just splitting hairs and what we got was close enough.  Technically, the gap is still open and historically is most likely to close, but I don't want to become obsessed over something that missed by only a few points.  Yesterday's reversal bar seemed impressive, and historically when we get a day like that (a gap up, then a 1% or larger decline to a multi-day low, then a big enough rebound to close in positive territory) we see higher prices over the next 1-2 days, though the edge isn't terribly great and it doesn't last any longer than 2 days.  I still see no reason just yet to change the outlook from a range-bound market (1110-1180), though given yesterday's (kinda-sorta?) successful re-test of the panic lows and the multiple positive intermediate-term studies we've looked at lately, I don't want to be aggressively short on even a short-term time frame here.

 

Current S&P futures:  +5 points at 1140 

Sentiment:

Trend: 

Back to neutral.

Lower lows, lower highs.

Sup / Res:

Other:

R: 1175; S: 1115

Neutral.

 

Go to:  Top  |  Short-term Outlook  |  Int-term Outlook  |  Equity Updates  |  Indicator Summary  |  Commodity Updates

 

 

Intermediate-term Outlook (1-3 Months):  Neutral  From Feb 2, 1104 SPX

 

 

What:  We will remain Neutral for now.

 

Why:  On April 15th, the Dumb Money pushed up to 75%, and the spread between that and the Smart Money reached to -45%.  In addition, we got a tremendous surge in the number of bearish (for the market) Indicators At Extremes.  That's the kind of development that doesn't necessarily indicate an imminent market peak, but it does almost always mean that any further short-term gains will be erased.  Now that that has happened, and volatility has exploded higher, we have a very unusual situation with the "shock day" on May 6th.  We looked at somewhat similar days on May 7th, and the conclusions were clear - a short-term rally was likely, probably being capped at a 62% retracement of the crash, then a re-test of the panic lows.  We possibly got that re-test on May 17th with the S&P dropping below 1115.  It didn't quite close the gap created when the market gapped up on May 10th , which is a thorn in the side of the re-test idea (all previous gaps of +4% or more have been closed at some point).  We've looked at quite a few intermediate-term bullish studies over the past week, but continue to feel that for now we will most likely see more back-and-forth trading before a sustained multi-week bottom is in place.  Given historical post-crash precedents, we shouldn't see much activity below 1110 or so, or above 1180ish, and would look for prices to bounce within that range for now.

 

Recent Studies:

Breadth thrusts (5/11): Bullish

Oversold oscillator (5/10): Bullish

Historic price momentum (4/23): Bullish

Extreme Indicator Score (4/16): Bearish

Sentiment:

Trend: 

Mixed readings.

Still pointing up.

Sup / Res:

Other:

R: 1180; S: 1115

Nothing notable.

 

Go to:  Top  |  Short-term Outlook  |  Int-term Outlook  |  Equity Updates  |  Indicator Summary  |  Commodity Updates

 

 

Equity Indicators - Updates and Extremes

 

Yale Buy-On-Dips Confidence

 

A subscriber wanted to know if there was anything to the Yale University confidence surveys, primarily their Buy-On-Dips Confidence Index.

 

This is a monthly survey that asks if you think the market will rise the day after a sharp fall.  In other words, does it make sense to buy into a crash (like May 6th)?  Unfortunately, the data isn't updated often enough to get the impression after the latest crash, so we'll have to wait to see how the most recent events impact the survey.

 

The most interesting part of the survey is that responses are separated out between institutions and individuals, so we can get a kind of "smart money", "dumb money" spread between the two.

 

That's what we have in the chart below.  High values mean that institutions are much more confident in buying a dip than are individuals.  In as much as we can assume that institutions are smart money (not always a safe assumption, granted), this should be bullish for stocks going forward.

 

Conversely, of course, if the spread is very low, then it means that the "dumb money" individuals are much more confident in buying into a decline than is the big money.

 

 

Theoretically, we should see more positive performance after large positive spreads than large negative spreads.

 

So let's check it out.  The data goes back to 1989, and was taken every six months until 2001 when it became monthly.  The table below highlights the performance of the S&P 500 six months and one year following the 20 largest positive spreads and 20 largest negative spreads.

 

 

6 Months

Later

1 Year

Later

Most Positive Spreads
Average +6% +10%
% Positive 70% 80%
Most Negative Spreads
Average +1% +1%
% Positive 75% 70%

 

Well, the data helps to confirm the theory, though the differences aren't as wide as one might expect.  In fact, six months later, the market actually was positive more often after the large negative spreads (though with a substantially lower return).

 

It was one year later that we see the biggest difference.  The average return after the positive spreads was +10% as opposed to only +1% after the negative spreads.  And there was an 80% chance of seeing an up market versus a 70% chance after large negative spreads.

 

Currently, the spread stands at +14, which is actually the 4th most-positive reading in the survey's history, and the highest since the fall of 1995 (right before the market rocketed higher).

 

The survey is by no means perfect, but if the data was updated more often - and with less of a delay - it could have some decent value as a sentiment measure.  As it stands, it could be a useful proxy for long-term large- vs. small-money participants, and is currently extremely bullish on a one-year time frame.

 

 

Go to:  Top  |  Short-term Outlook  |  Int-term Outlook  |  Equity Updates  |  Indicator Summary  |  Commodity Updates

 

 

Equity Market Indicators

 

Notes:

The relentless uptrend since the February bottom met with a couple of spikes in our bearish (for the market) indicators, and except for a small hiccup here and there, stocks didn't pay much mind.

 

A couple of weeks ago, we got a huge spike in the number of bearish indicators, and after a tiny hiccup, stocks went on to make another high.  It was choppy and took longer than usual, but it finally resulted in those gains begin given back per usual.  Now we're starting to see a move to the opposite extreme, but it's going to take awhile for the number of bearish indicators to drop off towards 0%.

 

More history:   Short-term Score     Long-term Score    Indicators At Extremes

 

 

* New extreme

See all indicators

 

Go to:  Top  |  Short-term Outlook  |  Int-term Outlook  |  Equity Updates  |  Indicator Summary  |  Commodity Updates

 

 

Bonds, Commodities and Currencies - Updates and Extremes

 

Nothing notable for today.

 

 

Jason Goepfert

Founder, Sundial Capital Research, Inc.

 

Go to:  Top  |  Short-term Outlook  |  Int-term Outlook  |  Equity Updates  |  Indicator Summary  |  Commodity Updates

 

 

 

 

Forwarding or other distribution of this email is prohibited without the express permission of Sundial Capital Research, Inc.  If you do not possess a firm-wide license, then forwarding this message will violate your subscription agreement.

 

VISIT THE SUBSCRIBER HOME PAGE

 

Privacy Policy      |      Disclaimer

 

© 2001-2010 Sundial Capital Research, Inc.  All rights reserved.

sentimenTrader.com is a trademark of Sundial Capital Research, Inc.

Sundial Capital Research, Inc.  12527 Central Avenue NE, Suite 165  Blaine, MN  55434