|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Short-term
Outlook:
Intermediate-term Outlook:
What: We will remain Neutral for now.
Why: In early January, the
Dumb Money Confidence hit 75%, which was another successful
"protect your gains" warning sign. By early February,
we went over several studies suggesting we were very close
to a good multi-week buy signal, but they just missed
triggering. In the process, there have been some more
encouraging signs (such as no
overwhelming number of
signs that we have seen a major market peak, the
advance/decline line at a new all-time high and
extreme momentum in small-cap stocks). The spread
between the Smart Money and Dumb Money is back at -25%,
which is a warning sign that further short-term gains will
likely be erased at some point in the next few weeks, but
we'll be more concerned about a more imminent - and more
dangerous - peak if the Dumb Money again pushes up above
70%.
Sentiment:
Trend:
Getting some overly optimistic readings.
Still pointing up. Sup / Res:
Other:
R: 1200; S: 1110 Positive breadth, small-cap
momentum
Equity Indicators - Updates and Extremes
We've spent some time going over the various streaks that
have popped up over the past week or so, in the VIX, Russell
2000 and yesterday the S&P 500.
That kind of persistent uptrend will tend to generate some
extremes, and we're seeing them among our indicators at an
increasing pace. One very notable development is in
the Up Volume Ratio for the NYSE.
The ratio simply looks at the volume going into stocks that
are up and stocks that are down each day, and calculates the
percentage of volume that went into the advancing stocks.
So a reading of 65%, for example, would mean that 65% of all
volume that day went into rising stocks.
On the site, we show this data via three moving averages,
short-term (5-day), intermediate-term (10-day) and long-term
(21-day). As of yesterday, all three moved above 65%.
Extreme? You bet...it's the first time all three were
that overbought at the same time in nearly 20 years.
If we restrict our search to only those times when the S&P
500 was near (within 1%) of a new 52-week high at the time,
we get about a dozen instances since 1950. The vast
majority of those were found in the 1950's, with only four
since then.
Looking at the latest four instances, the market did OK
afterward, but nothing too exciting either way. Six
months later, the S&P was still within 10% of where it was
when it reached such a phenomenal overbought level.
In '63, the S&P went absolutely nowhere for three months
before resuming its long-term rise. In '76, it rallied
hard for a month...and then essentially didn't do anything
for a year. In '78, stocks chopped up and down in a 4%
range for two months, then dropped hard for a month where it
formed a major low. In '91, the S&P again got stuck in
a tightly ranged market with modest upside bias for nine
months.
One real oddity that occurred yesterday was that despite
equities holding up well during the day and closing at a new
one-year high, our ultra short-term STEM.MR Model actually
closed near oversold territory. Now that's
weird.
Going back to 2002, there have only been four other days
when we've seen such a thing. The table below shows
the returns in the S&P going forward.
Date 1
Day Later 1
Week Later 1
Month Later
All four closed lower the next day, though not by any more
than -1%. And their recoveries were quick, showing
mostly positive returns in the day(s) following.
The instances in 2003 and 2006 led to steady positive
returns over the next few months, but the two from July 2005
saw the S&P form a minor intermediate-term peak a little
over a month later.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity Market Indicators
Notes: During the volatile correction into early February, we saw a spike in our Bullish (for the market) indicators to 30%, and the Bearish very nearly reached 0%. That coincided with the low in equities.
The rebound since then was met with mostly mediocre readings in our indicators, but that changed on Friday with more than 20% surging into bearish territory. It would need to reach at least 30% to signal any potential trouble, at least based on the tendencies we've seen since the March 2009 bottom.
More history:
* New extreme
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bonds, Commodities and Currencies - Updates and Extremes
Nothing notable for today.
Jason Goepfert Founder, Sundial Capital Research, Inc.
Forwarding or other distribution of this email is prohibited without the express permission of Sundial Capital Research, Inc. If you do not possess a firm-wide license, then forwarding this message will violate your subscription agreement.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© 2001-2010 Sundial Capital Research, Inc. All rights reserved. sentimenTrader.com is a trademark of Sundial Capital Research, Inc. Sundial Capital Research, Inc. 12527 Central Avenue NE, Suite 165 Blaine, MN 55434
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||