|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Short-term
Outlook:
Intermediate-term Outlook:
What: We will remain Neutral for now.
Why: On January 8th, the
Dumb Money Confidence hit 75%, and nearly every time we've seen
that kind of extreme in the past 15 years, any further
short-term strength (over 2-4 weeks) was reversed
longer-term (over 1-3 months). That happened again,
then we got some conflicting studies in early February about
whether we were likely at a low. We were oh-so-close
to triggering some very bullish multi-week setups, but price
reversed too early and we were left out. We still don't have an
overwhelming number of
signs that we have seen a major market peak, and now we
have the
advance/decline line at a new all-time high, which
usually pulls stocks up along with it. So unless
sentiment becomes overly optimistic very quickly, we'll
likely at least challenge the January highs...though the
risk/reward of trading it on an intermediate-term basis
seems only modestly positive due to the rally we've already
seen since the February low.
Sentiment:
Trend:
Mostly neutral.
Still pointing up. Sup / Res:
Other:
Resistance at 1030-1050, support
at 1080. Positive breadth.
Equity Indicators - Updates and Extremes
Rydex Leveraged Bearish Assets
Several times over the past six months, we've gone over the
change in how traders are moving money around in the Rydex
family of mutual funds. Since the July low, they've
changed how they historically have reacted to rallies and
declines.
That came into focus again over the past couple of days.
Despite the market rally, these traders greatly increased
their bets on the inverse, bearish index funds (that only
profit if the market declines). This kind of contrary
trading was very unusual prior to last July.
The chart below shows all the instances since then when the
S&P had rallied over the prior three days, but assets in the
leveraged inverse index funds exploded higher by at least
50%.
The table below shows the points gained (or lost) in the S&P
over the subsequent three days.
Date 3
Days Later Max
Points Lost Max
Points Gained
07/16/09 13.8 -6.1 15.8
08/21/09 2.0 -4.5 11.6
09/09/09 16.0 -5.4 16.3
10/08/09 7.7 -2.5 14.0
11/05/09 26.4 -7.4 29.8
12/14/09
-18.0 -18.3 2.1
12/24/09
-0.1 -4.5 3.9
01/07/10
-5.5 -9.9 8.1
Average 5.3
-7.3
12.7
From that turning point in July through November, this kind
of skepticism was not rewarded by the market. The S&P
rose at least 11 points at its best point over the next few
days every time, and never lost more than 7.5 at its worst.
The last three signals were less inspiring, however.
The S&P (cash index) showed a lower close, and the points
lost were greater than the points gained, each time.
When a previously consistent pattern fails three times in a
row, it's often a signal that that pattern has changed.
Perhaps the market's tendency to punish these Rydex traders
for trying to be contrarians is starting to subside.
Nonfarm Payroll Surprises
The elephant in the room today is the Nonfarm Payroll
report. Despite some early uncertainty about how much
weather is going to impact the number, the dispersion among
estimates isn't any greater than normal. For those
curious, Goldman Sachs' estimate (as of March 1st) was for a
change of -100k, versus consensus of -68k.
Below, we look at the S&P 500 future's performance from the
previous close to today's open, and then from today's open
to today's close for both beats and misses in the report.
First, the S&P's tendency to gap up or down after payrolls
were better than expected:
Since 1998, there has been a definite tendency to see the
futures open higher on stronger-than-expected payrolls.
That might seem logical, but logic often doesn't have a
place in reactions to economic reports.
15 out of the last 16 times that payrolls beat their
estimate, the S&P gapped up, averaging a gain of +0.5%.
But it managed to close higher than the open only 6 times, averaging a
return of -0.4%. Let's look at all the other
instances:
Pretty negative results here, especially since 2001.
It has been fairly rare to see payrolls beat estimates, the
market gap up, then actually see more buying pressure during
the trading day. Usually we fade before the close
(typically in the first half-hour).
Now let's switch to those times when payrolls miss
estimates. How often does the S&P gap up in those
cases?:
Logic would dictate that if the market consistently gapped
up after better-than-expected payrolls, then it would
usually gap down after misses. That has been the case
recently at least, as the S&P gapped down the last 6
times, averaging -0.7%.
But it closed higher than the
open 4 of the 6 times, averaging +0.3%.
Here are all the others:
Unlike when payrolls beat estimates and the gap up openings
tend to fade, when payrolls miss estimates, then the
S&P tends to gap down...and continue down into the close.
There were some major exceptions to the rule, as you can see
from the chart. During the volatility of late 2008 and
early 2009, a bad payroll number was cause for celebration
as traders assumed even more aggressive government
assistance. I don't think we'll see that same kind of
reaction again anytime soon, however.
By the way, there have been 6 times the S&P 500 SPDR (SPY) rose 5
straight days heading into a payroll report. It gapped
up on payroll day 4 times (whether payrolls beat estimates
or not), but closed below the open all 6
times. Here are the dates: 8/3/2001, 6/6/2003,
9/5/2003, 4/2/2004, 11/4/2005 and 4/9/2007.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity Market Indicators
Notes: During the volatile correction into early February, we saw a spike in our Bullish (for the market) indicators to 30%, and the Bearish very nearly reached 0%. That coincided with the low, though as we noted at the time, when the indicators get that extreme, they tend to keep going, and we usually see at least 50% bullish indicators at the ultimate low. Currently, they're back to about even and not telling us much either way.
More history:
* New extreme
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bonds, Commodities and Currencies - Updates and Extremes
Nothing notable for today.
Jason Goepfert Founder, Sundial Capital Research, Inc.
Forwarding or other distribution of this email is prohibited without the express permission of Sundial Capital Research, Inc. If you do not possess a firm-wide license, then forwarding this message will violate your subscription agreement.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© 2001-2010 Sundial Capital Research, Inc. All rights reserved. sentimenTrader.com is a trademark of Sundial Capital Research, Inc. Sundial Capital Research, Inc. 12527 Central Avenue NE, Suite 165 Blaine, MN 55434
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||