|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Short-term
Outlook:
Intermediate-term Outlook:
What: We will remain Neutral for now.
Why: On January 8th, the
Dumb Money Confidence hit 75%, and nearly every time we've seen
that kind of extreme in the past 15 years, any further
short-term strength (over 2-4 weeks) was reversed
longer-term (over 1-3 months). Now that that's
happened again, we're getting conflicting
studies about whether the price action over the past two weeks is
a sign of a larger trend change. We don't have an
overwhelming number of
signs that we have seen a major market peak, and several
sentiment measures turned very quickly from where they
were in mid-January. We looked at a couple of studies
in early February that suggested we could be very close to a
multi-week low, but they didn't quite trigger as prices
recovered more quickly than they "should" have. That
leaves us without much of a bias for a multi-month time
frame.
Sentiment:
Trend:
Mostly neutral.
Still pointing up. Sup / Res:
Other:
Resistance at 1100-1110, support
at 1050-1060. Nothing notable.
Equity Indicators - Updates and Extremes
Conference Board Consumer Confidence
One of the more popular topics last week was Consumer
Confidence, and namely the sharp drop in this month's
reading.
Over the past six months or so, the Conference Board and
University of Michigan's reports on consumers have had more
outsized market impacts than they typically have had in the
past, as traders fret about an economic recovery taking
hold.
The topic of the drop in Confidence has been well-worn
already over the past several days, but I did want to
highlight one interesting study that I haven't seen
mentioned elsewhere.
Not only was the 15%+ drop in Consumer Confidence large, it
came during a time when Confidence was already depressed.
The chart below shows the history of Consumer Confidence,
along with dotted lines that show any time the survey
dropped 15% or more while Confidence was already under 100.
The following table shows the returns in the S&P 500 going
forward after those instances:
Several of the dates were bunched together, which distorts
the average return somewhat. Still, they were
impressive. A few times, we saw stocks tank in the
short- to intermediate-term, but in every case the S&P was
positive on a long-term basis.
By six months later, the average return swamped "any random
time" returns. After a year, only two of the
occurrences did not show double-digit gains in stocks.
There were really only two times when this occurred after
the stock market had already rallied heartily. Those
were in April and May 1980 (though stocks had corrected more
than 10% right before the drop in confidence), and again in
1991 and 1992. Both times, stocks held well going
forward.
Trading among the smallest of options traders has been a
focus here ever since December and January when we were
seeing absolutely no desire for downside protection from
these traders (a very bad sign for the market), and to a
lesser extent, too much speculative interest in call
options.
There still has been no big surge in interest for
protection; buying protective put options was still the
least-favorite activity among small options traders last
week, garnering 17% of total volume (behind selling calls at
34% of volume, buying calls at 29% and selling puts at 21%).
There was one small glimmer for bulls, anyway.
Speculative call buying activity has dropped off
precipitously, declining from nearly 40% of total volume in
mid-January to less than 30% last week.
When looking over the past five years, this is a very low
level of speculation - in the bottom 5% of all weekly
readings.
So as the indices attempt to recover over half their January
losses, we can at least say that these small traders aren't
jumping on the bandwagon trying to ride it higher, which is
a help. But protective put buying remains very low,
and overall I would not consider this data to be giving a
"buy" signal. With the drop in call buying, however,
at least it's still not flashing "sell".
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity Market Indicators
Notes: During the volatile correction into early February, we saw a spike in our Bullish (for the market) indicators to 30%, and the Bearish very nearly reached 0%. That coincided with the low, though as we noted at the time, when the indicators get that extreme, they tend to keep going, and we usually see at least 50% bullish indicators at the ultimate low. Currently, they're back to about even and not telling us much either way.
More history:
* New extreme
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bonds, Commodities and Currencies - Updates and Extremes
Nothing notable for today.
Jason Goepfert Founder, Sundial Capital Research, Inc.
Forwarding or other distribution of this email is prohibited without the express permission of Sundial Capital Research, Inc. If you do not possess a firm-wide license, then forwarding this message will violate your subscription agreement.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© 2001-2010 Sundial Capital Research, Inc. All rights reserved. sentimenTrader.com is a trademark of Sundial Capital Research, Inc. Sundial Capital Research, Inc. 12527 Central Avenue NE, Suite 165 Blaine, MN 55434
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||