|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Short-term
Outlook:
Intermediate-term Outlook:
What: We will remain Neutral for now.
Why: On January 8th, the
Dumb Money Confidence hit 75%, and nearly every time we've seen
that kind of extreme in the past 15 years, any further
short-term strength (over 2-4 weeks) was reversed
longer-term (over 1-3 months). Now that that's
happened again, we're getting conflicting
studies about whether the price action over the past two weeks is
a sign of a larger trend change. We don't have an
overwhelming number of
signs that we have seen a major market peak, and several
sentiment measures turned very quickly from where they
were in mid-January. We looked at a couple of studies
in early February that suggested we could be very close to a
multi-week low, but they didn't quite trigger as prices
recovered more quickly than they "should" have. That
leaves us without much of a bias for a multi-month time
frame.
Sentiment:
Trend:
Mostly neutral.
Still pointing up. Sup / Res:
Other:
Resistance at 1100-1110, support
at 1050-1060. Nothing notable.
Equity Indicators - Updates and Extremes
Federal Reserve Humphrey Hawkins Testimony
A couple of weeks ago, we touched on Fed Chairman Bernanke's
semi-annual testimony to Congress. It used to just be
called Humphrey Hawkins, now it's the Federal Reserve Board
Monetary Policy Report to the Congress.
Now that it's here (scheduled to begin tomorrow), let's
revisit the S&P 500's performance after prior February
testimonies.
The day(s) before the testimonies have been mixed, perfectly
in line with random (not shown in the table). The
day(s) after, however, have been a different story.
There have been 8 years when the S&P was up over the month
prior to the testimony. In those cases, seven days
after the testimony the S&P was positive only 1 time, and
showed an average return of -2.0% (the one gain was a modest
+0.4%).
Even more remarkable was the risk/reward skew. During
those seven-day trades, the most the S&P gained at any point
averaged only +0.6%...but the most it dropped averaged
-3.3%, more than five times as large as the max gain.
Only one of those years saw a gain more than +1% at any
point, while six of the year saw losses greater than at
least -1.5%.
Needless to say, it was extremely difficult for the market
to sustain any meaningful upside following those
testimonies.
This could simply be due to some seasonal quirk and not the
fault of the Chairmen's speaking ability, but we've most
often seen a meaningful whack following the speeches.
Most often, that weakness has continued into early March,
especially over the past nine years.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity Market Indicators
Notes: During the volatile correction of the past two weeks, we saw a spike in our Bullish (for the market) indicators to 30%, and the Bearish very nearly reached 0%. That coincided with the low (so far), though as we noted at the time, when the indicators get that extreme, they tend to keep going, and we usually see at least 50% bullish indicators at the ultimate low. Currently, they're back to about even and not telling us much either way.
More history:
* New extreme
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bonds, Commodities and Currencies - Updates and Extremes
Nothing notable for today.
Jason Goepfert Founder, Sundial Capital Research, Inc.
Forwarding or other distribution of this email is prohibited without the express permission of Sundial Capital Research, Inc. If you do not possess a firm-wide license, then forwarding this message will violate your subscription agreement.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© 2001-2010 Sundial Capital Research, Inc. All rights reserved. sentimenTrader.com is a trademark of Sundial Capital Research, Inc. Sundial Capital Research, Inc. 12527 Central Avenue NE, Suite 165 Blaine, MN 55434
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||