February 3, 2010, 7:45am EST   

  Print Report    Leave a comment  

 
Wednesday's Need-To-Know  

Smart / Dumb Money Confidence

 

* Our shortest-term indicators have moved into excessive optimism territory, the most extreme since mid-December.

 

* Based on the recent multi-month low and double 1% up days, history suggests that short-term follow-through from here will be a key tell for the intermediate-term performance of the S&P.

 

* Sentiment on Soybeans has soured to one of the worst levels in the past decade, despite that commodity holding its multi-year uptrend.

 

 

The Dumb Money is 46% confident in a rally.

The Smart Money is 50% confident in a rally.

 

Smart/Dumb Confidence

View longer history

 

 

Short-term Outlook:  Neutral  From Jan 27, 1090 SPX

 

 

What:  If the S&P 500 cash index trades above 1105, then falls below 1098, we will move to 25% Bearish.  We would then turn back to Neutral with a trade back above that previous intraday high.

 

Why:  Yesterday I mentioned the "sloppy bottom" pattern that we seemed to be carving out, and the mix of short-term sentiment readings we were seeing.  Yesterday's jump moved us closer to overbought, especially in sensitive indicators like the NYSE Cumulative TICK, and that's pushed the STEM.MR Models well into "excessive optimism" range.  The market has had difficult maintaining its upside momentum when the models are this overbought, but the one consistent exception to that is when we are emerging out of extremely oversold conditions.  Given the Intermediate-term Score from Monday's Report, I suppose that argument could be made.  Either way, as we discuss below, short-term follow-through should be key.  I'm expecting that the layered resistance from 1100-1110 will hold and we'll see a test of the recent lows, but if we continue to power higher then there will be compelling precedents suggesting even more upside.

 

Sentiment:

Trend: 

The STEM.MR Models are overbought.

Short-term trends are mixed.

Sup / Res:

Other:

Resistance from 1105-1100, support at last week's lows.

Nothing notable.

 

 

Intermediate-term Outlook:  Neutral  From Feb 2, 1104 SPX

 

 

What:  We will remain Neutral for now.

 

Why:  On January 8th, the Dumb Money Confidence hit 75%, and nearly every time we've seen that kind of extreme in the past 15 years, any further short-term strength (over 2-4 weeks) was reversed longer-term (over 1-3 months).  Now that that's happened again, we're getting conflicting studies about whether the price action over the past two weeks is a sign of a larger trend change.  We don't have an overwhelming number of signs that we have seen a major market peak, and several sentiment measures have turned very quickly from where they were a couple of weeks ago.  Given the recent multi-month low and double 1% up days, how the S&P performs in the short-term should give us a good clue as to whether we've already likely seen another lasting bottom, per the study discussed in today's Report.

 

Sentiment:

Trend: 

Mostly neutral, though getting a few oversold signals.

Rrising 200-day avg; higher highs/higher lows.

Sup / Res:

Other:

Resistance at 1100-1110, support at 1075-1080.

Nothing notable.

 

 

Equity Indicators - Updates and Extremes

 

S&P 500 Price And Volume

 

In a Research Report yesterday, we took a look at consecutive 1% up days following a multi-month low in the S&P 500.

 

Overall, there was a 77% probability that such a thrust was not a major low.  But let's take a closer look and see if there's anything else that can tip us off as to whether we should treat this as a likely recovery to new highs, or a "bull trap" that will most likely roll over.

 

Fortunately, there was a very simple test that identified every one of the major lows, and it's the kind of test we've used many times over the years:  follow-through.

 

Here are a couple of recent examples:

 

 

After every one of the major lows, the S&P was higher three trading days later.  Every time, buyers had enough interest to keep pushing into stocks, despite what were likely short-term overbought conditions at the time.

 

Out of 16 instances that the S&P showed a positive 3-day return following the 1% up days, 7 times it coincided with a major bottom.  That also means that 9 times, it did not lead to a major low, so there were many false-positives in there.  Overall, it took a median of 50 days for the S&P to hit its next two-month low.

 

Out of the 15 times it showed a negative return, none of them coincided with a major low, so there were no false negatives.  In these cases, it took a median of only 6 days for the S&P to roll over to a new two-month low.

 

Follow-through from here should be key.  While additional upside follow-through would be an apparent requisite for a major low, it would not necessarily guarantee it.  And if we roll over instead, then it would be a definite black mark on our intermediate-term rally prospects.

 

Equity Market Indicators

 

Notes:

Last week, we had more bullish (for the market) indicators than bearish ones.  The three other times that had occurred since the March low, stocks were able to form bottoms quickly thereafter.  This time, it took a bit longer, but again the market rallied off of those conditions.

 

Currently, there is a mix of bullish and bearish indicators, which is not suggestive of much of an edge either way.

 

More history:   Short-term Score     Long-term Score    Indicators At Extremes

 

 

* New extreme

See all indicators

 

Bonds, Commodities and Currencies - Updates and Extremes

 

Small Speculators And Public Opinion In Soybeans

 

On Monday, I touched on the fact that large commercial hedgers had established a new all-time record net long position in Wheat futures.

 

At the same time, we're seeing small speculators take the opposite side of those "smart money" traders not only in Wheat, but also Soybeans.  Not only that, but the latest Public Opinion reading dropped to its lowest level in a year, and one of the lowest in the past decade.

 

 

Soybeans are currently clutching to an uptrend line from the 2006 bottom, and given the sentiment conditions it should be able to maintain it and embark on a new rally attempt.

 

I know little of the fundamentals in grains, which can easily trump any technical or sentiment setup, but as long as that uptrend is intact and we see sentiment readings like this, my vote would be for higher prices.

 

 

Jason Goepfert

Founder, Sundial Capital Research, Inc.

 

 

Forwarding or other distribution of this email is prohibited without the express permission of Sundial Capital Research, Inc.  If you do not possess a firm-wide license, then forwarding this message will violate your subscription agreement.

 

VISIT THE SUBSCRIBER HOME PAGE

 

Privacy Policy      |      Disclaimer

 

© 2001-2010 Sundial Capital Research, Inc.  All rights reserved.

sentimenTrader.com is a trademark of Sundial Capital Research, Inc.

Sundial Capital Research, Inc.  12527 Central Avenue NE, Suite 165  Blaine, MN  55434