|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Short-term
Outlook:
Intermediate-term Outlook:
What: We will remain Neutral for now.
Why: On January 8th, the
Dumb Money Confidence hit 75%, and nearly every time we've seen
that kind of extreme in the past 15 years, any further
short-term strength (over 2-4 weeks) was reversed
longer-term (over 1-3 months). Now that that's
happened again, we're getting conflicting
studies about whether the price action over the past two weeks is
a sign of a larger trend change. We don't have an
overwhelming number of
signs that we have seen a major market peak, and several
sentiment measures have turned very quickly from where they
were a couple of weeks ago. Given the recent
multi-month low and double 1% up days, how the S&P performs
in the short-term should give us a good clue as to whether
we've already likely seen another lasting bottom, per the
study discussed in today's Report.
Sentiment:
Trend:
Mostly neutral, though getting a few oversold signals.
Rrising 200-day avg;
higher highs/higher lows. Sup / Res:
Other:
Resistance at 1100-1110, support
at 1075-1080. Nothing notable.
Equity Indicators - Updates and Extremes
S&P 500 Price And Volume
In a
Research Report yesterday,
we took a look at consecutive 1% up days following a
multi-month low in the S&P 500.
Overall, there was a 77% probability that such a thrust was
not a major low. But let's take a closer look and see
if there's anything else that can tip us off as to whether
we should treat this as a likely recovery to new highs, or a
"bull trap" that will most likely roll over.
Fortunately, there was a very simple test that identified
every one of the major lows, and it's the kind of test we've
used many times over the years: follow-through.
Here are a couple of recent examples:
After every one of the major lows, the S&P was higher
three trading days later. Every time, buyers had
enough interest to keep pushing into stocks, despite what
were likely short-term overbought conditions at the time.
Out of 16 instances that the S&P showed a positive
3-day return following the 1% up days, 7 times it coincided
with a major bottom. That also means that 9 times, it
did not lead to a major low, so there were many
false-positives in there. Overall, it took a median of
50 days for the S&P to hit its next two-month low.
Out of the 15 times it showed a negative return, none
of them coincided with a major low, so there were no false
negatives. In these cases, it took a median of only 6
days for the S&P to roll over to a new two-month low.
Follow-through from here should be key. While
additional upside follow-through would be an apparent
requisite for a major low, it would not necessarily
guarantee it. And if we roll over instead, then it
would be a definite black mark on our intermediate-term
rally prospects.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity Market Indicators
Notes: Last week, we had more bullish (for the market) indicators than bearish ones. The three other times that had occurred since the March low, stocks were able to form bottoms quickly thereafter. This time, it took a bit longer, but again the market rallied off of those conditions.
Currently, there is a mix of bullish and bearish indicators, which is not suggestive of much of an edge either way.
More history:
* New extreme
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bonds, Commodities and Currencies - Updates and Extremes
Small Speculators And Public Opinion In Soybeans
On Monday, I touched on the fact that large commercial hedgers had established a new all-time record net long position in Wheat futures.
At the same time, we're seeing small speculators take the opposite side of those "smart money" traders not only in Wheat, but also Soybeans. Not only that, but the latest Public Opinion reading dropped to its lowest level in a year, and one of the lowest in the past decade.
Soybeans are currently clutching to an uptrend line from the 2006 bottom, and given the sentiment conditions it should be able to maintain it and embark on a new rally attempt.
I know little of the fundamentals in grains, which can easily trump any technical or sentiment setup, but as long as that uptrend is intact and we see sentiment readings like this, my vote would be for higher prices.
Jason Goepfert Founder, Sundial Capital Research, Inc.
Forwarding or other distribution of this email is prohibited without the express permission of Sundial Capital Research, Inc. If you do not possess a firm-wide license, then forwarding this message will violate your subscription agreement.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© 2001-2010 Sundial Capital Research, Inc. All rights reserved. sentimenTrader.com is a trademark of Sundial Capital Research, Inc. Sundial Capital Research, Inc. 12527 Central Avenue NE, Suite 165 Blaine, MN 55434
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||