January 25, 2010, 7:15am EST   

  Print Report    Leave a comment  

 
Monday's Need-To-Know  

Smart / Dumb Money Confidence

 

* Friday's failure to hold initial support dropped us enough to hit an even bigger support zone...and trigger one of the most-stretched short-term sentiment readings in a decade.

 

* Readings such as we got on Friday should lead to a short-term bounce, and add even more importance to the 1085-1090 area on the S&P.

 

* While scary, such large 3-day drops from a 52-week high have not been good predictors of major trend changes over the past 80+ years.

 

 

The Dumb Money is 58% confident in a rally.

The Smart Money is 46% confident in a rally.

 

Smart/Dumb Confidence

View longer history

 

 

Short-term Outlook:  25% Bearish  From Jan 12, 1134 SPX

 

 

What:  We will move to Neutral with a reading above 1117 in the S&P 500 cash index, or a drop to 1085 or below that then reverses up more than 5 points.

 

Why:  There is no shortage of "hey, we're oversold!" proclamations heading into this week, and we take a look at one below.  It would be very rare to not see some kind of short-term bounce from readings like we got by Friday's close.  The evidence that we've seen a long-term trend change is still suspect (again, see below), but if we bounce and then fail to hold Friday's lows for more than a day or two, we'll certainly be seeing a change in character and a more aggressive posture in taking short positions will be a higher-probability move.  With earnings reports, major economic data, political appointments, geopolitical concerns, a major product launch from Apple and a FOMC meeting, we'll have to be on our toes this week.

 

Sentiment:

Trend: 

Deeply oversold on many fronts.

Short-term trends are questionable.

Sup / Res:

Other:

Resistance at 1115, Support at 1085.

Seasonality is modestly negative.

 

 

Intermediate-term Outlook:  25% Bearish  From Jan 21, 1116 SPX

 

 

What:  We will turn Neutral if the S&P 500 closes above 1151.

 

Why:  In March, we discussed a large number of reasons to expect an imminent rally of one to three months' duration, or perhaps even more.  The rally exceeded all expectations.  On January 8th, the Dumb Money Confidence hit 75%, and every time we've seen this kind of extreme in the past 15 years, any further short-term strength (over 2-4 weeks) was reversed longer-term (over 1-3 months).  We expect the same this time around, so it was a matter of waiting for price action to crack a little.  We're getting some conflicting studies about whether the price action the past few days is a sign of a larger trend change, so more than anything we want to see how any bounce from short-term oversold conditions plays out.  A bounce, then move under December's low (around 1090) will bring the intermediate-term trend into question.

 

Sentiment:

Trend: 

Still mildly bearish for the market, but off its worst levels.

Rrising 200-day avg; higher highs/higher lows.

Sup / Res:

Other:

Resistance at 1115, support at 1090.

Nothing notable.

 

 

Indicators - Updates and Extremes

 

Short-Term Indicator Score

 

There are any number of extremes we could discuss among our short-term indicators after Friday's drop through some widely-watched support levels.

 

Instead of going over a half-dozen of them, a good proxy is the short-term Score.  On Friday, it exceeded 80% for only the 11th time since 2000.

 

 

A week after the others, the S&P 500 was higher 8 out of 10 times, with an average return of nearly 4%.  The two failures were during the spectacular outliers after 9/11 and early October 2008.

 

The lesson from the other occurrences is clear - the broader market should bounce, and probably right away.  We've already seen a substantial bounce pre-market, so obviously that takes away some of the impact.

 

There have been 5 times the S&P gapped up at least +0.5% the next morning, as it's on track to do today.  All 5 tacked on more gains into the close, with all but one gaining an additional 1%.  After that, it was much more questionable.  For the record, here are those dates:  09/24/01, 02/28/07, 09/18/08, 11/21/08 and 10/29/09.

 

Any bounce will add an additional bit of oomph to Friday's (and December's...) low around 1090ish.  A bounce that then fails to hold this support for more than a day or two would be much more indicative of a larger change in trend.

 

Speaking of...

 

 

Large Drops From A High

 

That is only the 3rd time in history the S&P 500 suffered three consecutive 1% down days following a 52-week high.  After the others, the market rallied for a month then declined again, not hitting another new high for a couple of years (from 07/21/33) and the other time it continued to fall in the short-term then hit a new high a few months later (from 10/10/79).

 

But 1% moves aren't really good for context.  Sometimes 1% is average given the volatility of that time, and other times 1% is a huge move.  So let's look at this in a different way.

 

The table below shows the other times that the S&P 500 hit a 52-week high, then suffered a very large decline.  By "very large", we're talking about the largest 3-day loss in at least six months.  This is the kind of quick, scary decline that raises fear levels quickly and always makes investors wonder whether we've seen enough damage in sentiment to alter the long-term trend.

 

What we're looking at in the table is how long it took for the S&P 500 to bottom (and how much of a loss to get there) before embarking on a run to a new 52-week high.

 

S&P 500 Performance After Very Large

Loss Following A New 52-Week High

  Days 'Til Loss 'Til Days 'Til A New
Date Bottom Bottom 52-Week High
06/15/33 0 0.0% 11
07/21/33 489 -16.5% 543
04/09/43 0 0.0% 20
06/15/50 19 -11.9% 70
01/06/55 7 -1.3% 22
04/20/61 2 -2.2% 136
09/15/78 42 -12.0% 230
10/10/79 20 -5.9% 71
10/25/82 1 -1.4% 8
01/10/86 8 -1.6% 17
07/08/86 5 -4.0% 36
06/30/89 0 -0.2% 7
12/18/95 15 -1.6% 29
Median 7 -1.6% 29

 

The numbers confirm something we've looked at several times over the past 8 years - very large downside moves from high levels don't usually portend a bigger change in trend.  Tops are most often choppy affairs that are significantly less dramatic.  Not always, but usually.

 

From the table, we see that the median number of days it took to form an important bottom was barely longer than a week.  The average (median) drawdown was only -1.6%, though there were three losses greater than -10%.

 

The moves weren't usually a straight shot higher, though - it took an average of nearly 30 days to reach a new 52-week high.  The problem with that "Days 'Til New 52-Week High" column is the dispersion; there's a very high standard deviation among the precedents.

 

Bottom line, like the "top spotter" table we looked at last week, this move isn't necessarily indicative of a change in the long-term trend.

 

Equity Market Indicators

 

Notes:

Many of our shorter-term indicators have moved well into oversold territory, especially in the Volatility and Breadth groups.

 

By Friday's close, we had more bullish (for the market) indicators than bearish ones.  The three other times that's occurred since the March low, stocks were able to form bottoms quickly thereafter.  If we don't see that now, it will be a definite change in character for this uptrend.

 

More history:   Short-term Score     Long-term Score    Indicators At Extremes

 

 

* New extreme

See all indicators

 

On A Personal Note...

 

I've been a Vikings fan my entire life.  A year ago, a game like yesterday - with a half-dozen missed opportunities to put the game away -  would have seen me screaming at the TV and stuck in a pissy mood for a week.

 

When my daughter started having seizures a year ago, several of you wrote to say that on the bright side, there may be some good that comes of it.  And you know what?  There has been.

 

Last night, I tuned out the tube during the fourth quarter and played with my daughter instead.  The game ceased to matter in the least, and after an hour of playing forts, balloon toss and robot, I'm in the best mood I've been in all weekend.

 

And I'm actually looking forward to the Super Bowl, even though the Vikes aren't in it.  But if my kids want to play...well, then I'll shut that game off too.

 

Jason Goepfert

Founder, Sundial Capital Research, Inc.

 

 

Forwarding or other distribution of this email is prohibited without the express permission of Sundial Capital Research, Inc.  If you do not possess a firm-wide license, then forwarding this message will violate your subscription agreement.

 

VISIT THE SUBSCRIBER HOME PAGE

 

Privacy Policy      |      Disclaimer

 

© 2001-2010 Sundial Capital Research, Inc.  All rights reserved.

sentimenTrader.com is a trademark of Sundial Capital Research, Inc.

Sundial Capital Research, Inc.  12527 Central Avenue NE, Suite 165  Blaine, MN  55434